The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revelation 21-22 in Light of Jewish and Greco-Roman Utopianism
Open accessAbstract
offers a creative and compelling reading of Revelation 21-22 as understood through the lens of ancient utopianism. The work is in two parts beginning with a detailed portrait of ancient utopianism based on Greco-Roman and Jewish traditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Best practice. Religious reformation in Philo’s representation of the Therapeutae and Therapeutrides
Standhartinger, A. (2017) · Beyond Priesthood · doi:10.1515/9783110448184-006 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilchrest, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Judson College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gilchrest, Eric J.
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2013-05-01
- OpenAlex
- W599831987
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Keywords
- utopianism, New Testament exegesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
