Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,502

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation

Open access
Kamp, Hans·2013·Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation

Abstract

Two conceptions of meaning have dominated formal semantics of natural language. The first of these sees meaning principally as that which determines conditions of truth. This notion has inspired the disciplines of truth theoretic and model-theoretic semantics. According to the second conception meaning is, first and foremost, that which a language user grasps when he understands the words he hears or reads. The two conceptions have remained separated, and the semantic theory presented in this chapter is an attempt to remove this obstacle. The theory combines a definition of truth with a systematic account of semantic representations. The analysis of pronominal anaphora is informed by the conviction that the mechanisms which govern deictic and anaphoric occurrences of pronouns are basically the same. Keywords:anaphoric; language; pronoun; semantic representation; Theory of Truth

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004252882_014

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,502

Metadata

Authors
Kamp, H.
Venue
Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation
Publisher
BRILL
Published
2013-01-01
Pages
329-369
OpenAlex
W1581218697
Cited by
1,502
References
0
FWCI
320.70
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/9789004252882_014
The paper
Kamp, H. (2013). A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation. Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004252882_014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.