CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawCorporate Law and Human RightsExtractivism and Socioeconomic Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Resources Grabbing and Human Rights: Building a Triangular Relationship Between States, Indigenous Peoples and Corporations

Open access
Gilbert, Jérémie, Bernaz, Nadia·2016·Natural Resources Grabbing: An International Law Perspective
DOI 10.1163/9789004305663_004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of a chapter accepted for\npublication in Angelica Bonfanti, Francesca Romanin Jacur, Francesco Seatzu\n(eds), Natural Resources Grabbing: Natural Resources Grabbing: An International\nLaw Perspective, (Brill, 2016). \nThe version of record is available at:\nhttp://www.brill.com/products/book/natural-resources-grabbing

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004305663_004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gilbert, J., & Bernaz, N.
ORCID
Venue
Natural Resources Grabbing: An International Law Perspective
Publisher
Brill | Nijhoff
Published
2016-01-01
Pages
38-51
DOI
10.1163/9789004305663_004
OpenAlex
W2150324665
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brill | Nijhoff eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Corporate Law and Human Rights
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
Keywords
human rights, indigenous peoples, state, corporations, triangular relations, international law, extractivism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review