The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Varieties of Multiple Modernities: New Research Design
Abstract
To date, the nascent consequential notion of ‘multiple modernities’ has been predominately grounded in historical research with the purpose of validating the theory. Yet, the notion of multiple modernities represents a radical transformation in the way modernity and, indeed, the contemporary world is viewed. As such, the central aim of this volume is to explore the implications and hidden understanding of the multiple modernities research project beyond historical analysis in order to investigate its wide ranging omnipresent implications as they exist in communication and in the social order of societal membership in contemporary societies. This volume collects new research about multiple modernities and globalization. It shows the new turn of sociological theory in the contemporary scene with respect to multiple modernities, multi-centrism, transglobality, hybridization and multiculturalism, and explores it as a new area of societal communication – one that takes effect in the sectors of a global society as a ‘society of societies’. The studies in this book converge to demonstrate that the route of Western modernization, its cultural program and its institutional structure, does not follow the pathway of modernization that we have thus far observed in the emerged new area. Rather, the continuation of the multiple modernities research program is given a new design, researching the social structure and dynamic of postmodern societies, their exchange and the debate about the flow of free resources. But the studies are also evidence that the sociological theory has no normative foundation. Contributors are: Mehdi P. Amineh, Barrie Axford, Eliezer Ben-Rafael, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, Mark Jarzombek, Werner Krawietz, Judit Bokser Liwerant, Manussos Marangudakis, Jan Nederveen Pieterse, Gerhard Preyer, Roland Robertson, Luis Roniger, Yitzhak Sternberg, and Michael Sussman.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hofstede agrees with this modified notion of modernization theory implying the existence of multiple paths to modernity (cf. Eisenstadt’s notion of “multiple modernities,” Preyer & Sussman, 2016).”
From Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart (2018) · cites this paper as Preyer & Sussman, 2016
Citations
Cited by
Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart
Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022118798505 · Cited by 461
Metadata
- Authors
- Preyer, G., & Sussmann, M.
- ORCID
- Preyer, Gerhard
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4256507723
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Modernity and Self-Identity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Globalization and Cultural Identity
- Keywords
- multiple modernities, globalization, cultural hybridity, multiculturalism, Western modernization, postmodern society, social order, sociology of modernity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Varieties of Multiple Modernities: New Research Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/9789004306714
- The paper
- Preyer, G., & Sussmann, M. (2016). Varieties of Multiple Modernities: New Research Design. BRILL eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004306714