The DOI matches its Crossref record.
2 Abhidharmic Elements in Gandhāran Mahāyāna Buddhism: Groups of Four and the abhedyaprasādas in the Bajaur Mahāyāna Sūtra
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This group is clearly based on the traditional concept of the avetyaprasādas, one of the well-known qualities of a stream-enterer.
“This group is clearly based on the traditional concept of the avetyaprasāda s, one of the well-known qualities of a stream-enterer.”
From The Bajaur Mahāyāna Sūtra. A Summary of Its Contents (2016) · cites this paper as Schlosser & Strauch 2016, part 2
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Bajaur Mahāyāna Sūtra. A Summary of Its Contents
Schlosser, A., & Strauch, I. (2016) · SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) · doi:10.2143/jiabs.39.0.3200528
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlosser, A., & Strauch, I.
- Venue
- Text, History, and Philosophy
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- Pages
- 47-107
- OpenAlex
- W2500166350
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Abhidharmakośa, Buddhist doctrine, Gandhara
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
