The DOI matches its Crossref record.
11 Sino-Tibetan Buddhism: Continuities and Discontinuities: The Case of Nenghai’s Legacy in the Contemporary Era
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nenghai advocated the simultaneous practice of Vinaya and tantra from the perspective of exoteric and esoteric combined practice following a Gelugpa model.
“As Esther Bianchi noted, Nenghai advocated the simultaneous practice of Vinaya and tantra from the perspective of exoteric and esoteric combined practice following a Gelugpa model (Bianchi 2021, pp. 225-52; Bianchi 2017, pp. 300-18; Bianchi 2009, pp. 295-346; Bianchi 2003)”
From The Transnational Experience of a Chinese Buddhist Master in the Asian Buddhist Network (2023) · cites this paper as Bianchi 2017
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Transnational Experience of a Chinese Buddhist Master in the Asian Buddhist Network
Zhang, X. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14081052 · Cited by 1
Esler, J. (2025) · Asian Ethnicity · doi:10.1080/14631369.2024.2385558 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bianchi, E.
- Corresponding author
- Bianchi, Ester
- ORCID
- Bianchi, Ester
- Venue
- Chinese and Tibetan Esoteric Buddhism
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Pages
- 300-319
- OpenAlex
- W2601953689
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 10
- FWCI
- 43.87
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- continuity and discontinuity, contemporary Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism in China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
