Cited by 561Linguistics and Discourse AnalysisLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

Planned and Unplanned Discourse

Ochs, Elinor·1979·Discourse and Syntax

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004368897_004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pre-task planning facilitates 'planned language use', which is characterized by more complex, target-like forms than unplanned language use.

    “It facilitates 'planned language use', which, as Ochs (1979) noted, is characterized by more complex, target-like forms than unplanned language use.”

    From Focus on form: A critical review (2016) · cites this paper as Ochs (1979)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ochs, E.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Ochs, Elinor
Venue
Discourse and Syntax
Publisher
BRILL
Published
1979-12-20
Pages
51-80
OpenAlex
W3000532071
Cited by
561
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
FWCI
103.38
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
discourse planning, discourse structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review