The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Locative Inversion in Chicheŵa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning argument structure generalizations
(2004) · cogl · doi:10.1515/cogl.2004.011 · Cited by 678
How Efficiency Shapes Human Language
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. P., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003 · Cited by 485
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Non-configurationality in Australian aboriginal languages
Austin, P., & Bresnan, J. (1996) · Natural Language and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1007/bf00133684 · Cited by 337
Self-citationIconicity and Generative Grammar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1992) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1992.0047 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Bresnan, J., & Kanerva, J. M.
- Venue
- Syntax and the Lexicon
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1992-12-26
- Pages
- 53-101
- OpenAlex
- W1571496667
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 0
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locative Inversion in Chicheŵa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/9789004373181_006
- The paper
- Bresnan, J., & Kanerva, J. M. (1992). Locative Inversion in Chicheŵa: A Case Study of Factorization in Grammar. Syntax and the Lexicon. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373181_006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
