The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Thinking on Empty: Madhyamaka Anti-Realism and Canons of Rationality
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“So, there are no ultimately true propositions (because there is nothing for them to be true of ), yet there is an ultimate truth: śūnyatā .”
From An All-new Timeless Truth: A Madhyamaka Analysis of Conflict and Compromise in Buddhist Modernism (2017) · cites this paper as Siderits 1989, 231
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An All-new Timeless Truth: A Madhyamaka Analysis of Conflict and Compromise in Buddhist Modernism
McGuire, R. (2017) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2017.1396048
Metadata
- Authors
- Siderits, M.
- Corresponding author
- Siderits, M.
- Venue
- Rationality in Question
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1989-01-01
- Pages
- 231-249
- OpenAlex
- W4392500741
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- Madhyamaka, anti-realism, emptiness, Buddhist philosophy, epistemology, Buddhist epistemology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking on Empty: Madhyamaka Anti-Realism and Canons of Rationality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/9789004451544_015
- The paper
- Siderits, M. (1989). Thinking on Empty: Madhyamaka Anti-Realism and Canons of Rationality. Rationality in Question. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004451544_015
