The Combined Practice of Vinaya and Tantra in Nenghai’s Path to Liberation
Abstract
Nenghai 能海 (1886–1967) was both a renowned Chinese Gelugpa tantric master and a vinaya expert, who advocated the “simultaneous practice of vinaya and tantra” (lümi jian xiu 律密兼修). He conceived the relationship between vinaya and tantra within an “exoteric and esoteric combined practice” (xianmi shuangxiu 顯密雙修), an approach drawn from the Gelugpa model. However, Nenghai integrated it with a reconnection to the Chinese vinaya lineage and with a modernist approach to vinaya and Buddhism. In so doing, he also advanced the fascinating idea that tantra and vinaya share the very same esoteric nature. Nenghai’s choice of the vinaya lineage of the Dharmaguptaka and the striking predominance of Chinese Buddhist monastic conventions placed his communities at the heart of the Chinese monastic tradition. Moreover, his textual-oriented approach to vinaya, and his interest in the Āgamas—two genres that he regarded as remnants of an alleged “original” and “primordial” Buddhism—reveal a modernist perspective, which had already made its way into South Asia, South-East Asia, Japan, and China but not so much into Tibet. In a nutshell, in acknowledging that Nenghai’s system of combining vinaya and tantra is based on the Gelugpa system—which promotes the practice of tantric Buddhism together with monasticism—this study highlights the peculiarities of Nenghai’s vision when compared with the standard Gelugpa practice, a vision which reflects a Chinese Buddhist identity as well as a modernist approac…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nenghai advocated the simultaneous practice of Vinaya and tantra from the perspective of exoteric and esoteric combined practice following a Gelugpa model.
“As Esther Bianchi noted, Nenghai advocated the simultaneous practice of Vinaya and tantra from the perspective of exoteric and esoteric combined practice following a Gelugpa model (Bianchi 2021, pp. 225-52; Bianchi 2017, pp. 300-18; Bianchi 2009, pp. 295-346; Bianchi 2003)”
From The Transnational Experience of a Chinese Buddhist Master in the Asian Buddhist Network (2023) · cites this paper as Bianchi 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Transnational Experience of a Chinese Buddhist Master in the Asian Buddhist Network
Zhang, X. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14081052 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bianchi, E.
- Corresponding author
- Bianchi, Ester
- ORCID
- Bianchi, Ester
- Venue
- Sino-Tibetan Buddhism across the Ages
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2021-08-12
- Pages
- 225-252
- OpenAlex
- W4232407480
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Buddhist monastic discipline, esoteric Buddhism, liberation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review