Cited by 27Chinese history and philosophyIndian and Buddhist StudiesReligious Tourism and Spaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Cult of Pao-sheng ta-ti and its spreading to Taiwan—A Case Study of fen-hsiang

Schipper, Kristofer·1990·Development and Decline of Fukien Province in the 17th and 18th Centuries

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004488458_015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schipper, K.
Corresponding author
Schipper, Kristofer
Venue
Development and Decline of Fukien Province in the 17th and 18th Centuries
Publisher
BRILL
Published
1990-01-01
Pages
397-416
OpenAlex
W4385169645
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 14 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Religious Tourism and Spaces
Keywords
Chinese folk religion, Taiwan, Chinese diaspora religion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review