The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Judaism and Zionism in the Holy Land
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To je proces »prekršaja, pokajanja i obnove« (Kedourie, 1988, 289) koji Židovi ne mogu samovoljno prekinuti, primjerice povratkom u Erec Izrael, nego moraju čekati da se Bog, nakon što se ispuni vrijeme pokore, smiluje i vrati ih iz progonstva kao što ih je nekoć vratio iz Babilona.”
From Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka (2020) · cites this paper as Kedourie, 1988, 289
In the citing paper
“Naklapanja o vremenu Mesijina dolaska su zabranjena (Kedourie, 1988, 288)”
From Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka (2020) · cites this paper as Kedourie, 1988, 288
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aspekti razvoja židovske političke mesijanske misli nakon Bar Kohbina ustanka
Havel, B. (2020) · Obnovljeni život · doi:10.31337/oz.75.2.5 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Kedourie, E.
- Venue
- The Holy Land in History and Thought
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1988-01-01
- Pages
- 287-291
- OpenAlex
- W4386467850
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Jewish Identity and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Keywords
- Judaism, Zionism, Holy Land, Jewish history, Jewish identity, Jewish diaspora
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
