The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Rabbinic Traditions about the Pharisees before 70: Volume 3 Conclusions
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rabbinic view includes the oral Torah as part of the universal legislation incumbent on all Jews.
“In contrast, the rabbinic view includes the oral Torah as part of the universal legislation incumbent on all Jews (Neusner 1971, p. 163).”
From Nomos and the Dispute in Galatians 2: A Case of Conflicting By-Laws (2023) · cites this paper as Neusner 1971, p. 163
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nomos and the Dispute in Galatians 2: A Case of Conflicting By-Laws
Lavender, J. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14121449 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Neusner, J.
- Corresponding author
- Neusner, Jacob
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1971-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4387388515
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Pharisees, rabbinic literature, Second Temple Judaism, Jewish apologetics, Jewish-Christian relations, early rabbinic Judaism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
