The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Transformation of Doubt (Yíqíng 疑情) into a Positive Emotion in Chinese Buddhist Meditation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By the time doubt has been fully appraised and considered in East Asia by Dahui and other Sŏn Buddhist adepts, this debilitating mental concomitant (caitta/cetasika) has been transformed into the principal force driving one toward enlightenment.
“By the time doubt has been fully appraised and considered in East Asia by Dahui and other Sŏn Buddhist adepts, this debilitating mental concomitant (Skt. caitta , Pāli cetasika ) has been transformed into the principal force driving one toward enlightenment.”
From The ‘Sensation of Doubt’ in East Asian Zen Buddhism and Some Parallels with Pāli Accounts of Meditation Practice (2018) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buswell, R. E. (2018) · Contemporary Buddhism · doi:10.1080/14639947.2018.1443556 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buswell, R. E.
- Corresponding author
- Buswell, Robert E.
- Venue
- Love and Emotions in Traditional Chinese Literature
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Pages
- 225-236
- OpenAlex
- W4239823738
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- Buddhist meditation, Chinese Buddhism, positive emotions, emotional transformation, meditation practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
