The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards An Understanding Of Mani’s Religious Development And The Archaeology Of Manichaean Identity
Abstract
Over the last century and more, new discoveries and trends of scholarship have rescued the study of Manichaeism from the polemic of heresy, and identified it as a major world religion in its own right. It has even been claimed that it was the first real religion in the modern sense, in that it was (supposedly) created with its doctrines, practices, scriptures and institutions all in place. Nevertheless, debate continues about the core issues of Manichaean identity; and, in particular, its relationship to prior religions such as 'gnosticism', Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Buddhism. This chapter explores some of these issues through a number of rather specific examples drawn from Manichaean thought and practice. The purpose of the chapter is to show how an archaeology of Manichaean identity might be possible through an exacting examination of textual traditions. Keywords: archaeology of religion; Buddhism; Christianity; gnosticism; Manichaean identity; religious development; Zoroastrianism
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mani's logia that circulated within the Manichaean Church together with excerpts from Mani's treatises could be used in new texts developing various theological questions.
“It appears likely that Mani's logia that circulated within the Manichaean Church together with excerpts from Mani's treatises could be used in new texts developing various theological questions.41”
From The Power of the Written Word in Manichaeism (2021) · cites this paper as Gardner 2010: 152-153
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Power of the Written Word in Manichaeism
Moiseeva, E. (2021) · Numen · doi:10.1163/15685276-12341647 · Cited by 2
Nasoraia, B. H. S. (2024) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel16010014
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, I.
- Corresponding author
- Gardner, Iain
- Venue
- Religion and Retributive Logic
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- Pages
- 143-156
- OpenAlex
- W612558778
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Manichaeism, archaeology of religion, religious development, textual transmission, Buddhism, Christianity, Gnosticism, Zoroastrianism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review