Cited by 1Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchElectronic Health Records Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SleepDB: A Clinical and Administrative Database Developed to Improve the Diagnosis, Management and Longitudinal Tracking of Sleep Disorders

Stretch, R.J., Chavez, K., Christensen, K., Convis, J., Fung, C.H., Ryden, A.M., Zeidler, M.R.·2019·A34. SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT IN SLEEP DISORDERS

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2019.199.1_meetingabstracts.a1389

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stretch, R. J., Chavez, K., Christensen, K., Convis, J., Fung, C. H., Ryden, A. M., & Zeidler, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
Venue
A34. SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT IN SLEEP DISORDERS
Published
2019-05
Pages
A1389-A1389
OpenAlex
W2971210112
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
sleep disorders, medical databases, administrative databases, long-term tracking, sleep disorder diagnosis, sleep disorder management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review