The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome of the treatment for sarcoidosis.
Abstract
The clinical characteristics and pathology of sarcoidosis are well defined; however, the optimal therapy for this disorder remains unclear. Although patients respond, acutely, to corticosteroid therapy, it is not clear that these agents ultimately alter the natural history of this disease. These observations and that corticosteroids have significant side effects suggest that only patients who will clearly benefit from corticosteroid therapy should be treated. In a prospective study of patients' with sarcoidosis (n = 98), we limited our use of corticosteroids to those patients who had objective evidence of recent deterioration in lung function or serious extrapulmonary disease. All patients with sarcoidosis fulfilling these criteria were treated with corticosteroids. Patients were tapered off corticosteroids after they were treated for 1 yr. Of the 98 study subjects, 91 had not received therapy for the disease and 7 were on therapy before entry into the study. Of the 91 previously untreated patients, 55 were observed without therapy and 36 were treated with corticosteroids. Of those who were observed off therapy, only eight deteriorated. Of these latter patients, six responded and stabilized with the administration of corticosteroids for treatment of the underlying disease, to antibiotics for an associated bronchiectasis, or to diuretics for treatment for congestive heart failure; two were lost to follow-up. None of these six patients deteriorated while receiving corticosteroids. Of the 36 patients who deteriorated and were treated with corticosteroids, 20 remained stable and 16 improved clinically. Of the 37 patients who were eventually tapered off corticosteroids, five deteriorated and required reinitiation of corticosteroid therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clinical Characteristics of Patients in a Case Control Study of Sarcoidosis
BAUGHMAN, R. P., TEIRSTEIN, A. S., JUDSON, M. A., ROSSMAN, M. D., YEAGER, H., BRESNITZ, E. A., DePALO, L., HUNNINGHAKE, G., IANNUZZI, M. C., JOHNS, C. J., et al. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2104046 · Cited by 1,808
Self-citationGottlieb, J. E., Israel, H. L., Steiner, R. M., Triolo, J., & Patrick, H. (1997) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.111.3.623 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunninghake, G. W., Gilbert, S., Pueringer, R., Dayton, C., Floerchinger, C., Helmers, R., Merchant, R., Wilson, J., Galvin, J., & Schwartz, D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 893-898
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W1988497385
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome of the treatment for sarcoidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.149.4.8143052
- The paper
- Hunninghake, G. W., Gilbert, S., Pueringer, R., Dayton, C., Floerchinger, C., Helmers, R., Merchant, R., Wilson, J., Galvin, J., & Schwartz, D. (1994). Outcome of the treatment for sarcoidosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.149.4.8143052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.