The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury.
Abstract
Intermittent positive pressure ventilation with large tidal volumes and high peak airway pressures can result in pulmonary barotrauma. In the present study, we examined the hypothesis that ventilation at very low lung volumes can also worsen lung injury by repeated opening and closing of airway and alveolar duct units as ventilation occurs from below to above the infection point (Pinf) as determined from the inspiratory pressure-volume curve. We ventilated isolated, nonperfused, lavaged rat lungs with physiologic tidal volumes (5 to 6 ml/kg) at different end-expiratory pressures (above and below Pinf) and studied the effect on compliance and lung injury. In the groups ventilated with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) below Pinf compliance fell dramatically after ventilation. It did not change in either the control group or the group ventilated with PEEP above Pinf. Lung injury assessed morphologically was significantly greater in the groups ventilated with a PEEP below Pinf, and in these groups the site of injury was dependent on the level of PEEP. The group ventilated without PEEP had significantly greater respiratory and membranous injury to bronchioles, while the group ventilated with PEEP of 4 cm H2O had significantly greater alveolar duct injury. In conclusion, ventilation at lung volumes below those found at Pinf caused a significant decrease in lung compliance and progression of lung injury. Therefore, in addition to high airway pressures, end-expiratory lung volume is an important determinant of the degree and site of lung injury during positive-pressure ventilation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421801 · Cited by 12,941
Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Amato, M. B. P., Barbas, C. S. V., Medeiros, D. M., Magaldi, R. B., Schettino, G. P., Lorenzi-Filho, G., Kairalla, R. A., Deheinzelin, D., Munoz, C., Oliveira, R., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199802053380602 · Cited by 3,654
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Amato, M. B. P., Meade, M. O., Slutsky, A. S., Brochard, L., Costa, E. L. V., Schoenfeld, D. A., Stewart, T. E., Briel, M., Talmor, D., Mercat, A., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1410639 · Cited by 2,801
Self-citation(2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032193 · Cited by 2,565
Ranieri, V. M., Suter, P. M., Tortorella, C., De Tullio, R., Dayer, J. M., Brienza, A., Bruno, F., & Slutsky, A. S. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.1.54 · Cited by 1,908
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Muscedere, J. G., Mullen, J. B., Gan, K., & Slutsky, A. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1327-1334
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2009478257
- Cited by
- 1,244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173774
- The paper
- Muscedere, J. G., Mullen, J. B., Gan, K., & Slutsky, A. S. (1994). Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.149.5.8173774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.