The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immunomodulation by theophylline in asthma. Demonstration by withdrawal of therapy.
Abstract
Theophylline is the most widely used anti-asthma drug worldwide and is classified as a bronchodilator, although there is increasing evidence that it may have immunomodulatory effects. We have investigated the effects of theophylline withdrawal under placebo control in 27 asthmatic patients (25 to 70 yr) treated with long-term theophylline who were also treated with high dose inhaled corticosteroids. We measured asthma symptoms (diary card), lung function (spirometry and home records of peak expiratory flow), and peripheral leukocyte populations using dual color flow cytometry. In eight of these patients, we examined fiberoptic bronchial biopsies by immunocytochemistry. We also studied peripheral blood lymphocytes in eight asthmatic patients who have never received theophylline. Mean steady state plasma theophylline concentrations during theophylline therapy were 8.6 +/- 0.9 mg/L. Theophylline withdrawal was associated with a significant increase in asthma symptoms, particularly at night, and a fall in spirometry and morning peak flow. This was accompanied by a significant fall in peripheral blood monocytes (CD14+, activated CD4+ T-lymphocytes (CD4+/CD25+) and activated CD8+ T-cells (CD8+/HLA-DR+) in patients with a plasma theophylline > 5 mg/L. The lymphocyte populations in theophylline-naive patients were similar to those found after theophylline withdrawal. Bronchial biopsies showed a mirror image of the peripheral blood with an increase in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes in the airway. Chronic treatment with theophylline, even at low plasma concentrations, controls asthma symptoms and has effects on T-lymphocyte populations in the peripheral blood which are the inverse of those observed in the airways.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
PAUWELS, R. A. (1996) · Arerugī/Arerugi · doi:10.15036/arerugi.45.792 · Cited by 9,994
Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary
Bateman, E. D., Hurd, S. S., Barnes, P. J., Bousquet, J., Drazen, J. M., FitzGerald, M., Gibson, P., Ohta, K., O'Byrne, P., Pedersen, S. E., et al. (2008) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00138707 · Cited by 3,203
Self-citationIto, K., Lim, S., Caramori, G., Cosio, B., Chung, K. F., Adcock, I. M., & Barnes, P. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.132556899 · Cited by 512
Self-citationBarnes, P. J. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201302-0388pp · Cited by 444
Self-citationPharmacology of the Eosinophil
Giembycz, M. A., & Lindsay, M. A. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01404-2 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Kidney, J., Dominguez, M., Taylor, P. M., Rose, M., Chung, K. F., & Barnes, P. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1907-1914
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W1988854276
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunomodulation by theophylline in asthma. Demonstration by withdrawal of therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767539
- The paper
- Kidney, J., Dominguez, M., Taylor, P. M., Rose, M., Chung, K. F., & Barnes, P. J. (1995). Immunomodulation by theophylline in asthma. Demonstration by withdrawal of therapy. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767539
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.