Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 696

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Re-intubation increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients needing mechanical ventilation.

Torres, A, Gatell, J M, Aznar, E, el-Ebiary, M, Puig de la Bellacasa, J, González, J, Ferrer, M, Rodriguez-Roisin, R·1995·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

In order to confirm that re-intubation can be a risk factor of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a case-control study was performed. Forty consecutive patients needing re-intubation were selected as cases. Each case was paired with a matched control for the previous duration of mechanical ventilation (+/- 2 d). Nineteen (47%) of the cases developed pneumonia after re-intubation compared with 4 (10%) of the controls (odds ratio [OR] = 8.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 105.9; p = 0.0007). After adjusting for age, sex, and presence of prior bronchoscopy, the conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that re-intubation was the only significant factor related to the development of pneumonia (OR: 5.94; 95% CI 1.27 to 22.71; p = 0.023). Sixteen (73%) of the 22 patients lying semirecumbent during the interval between extubation and re-intubation developed nosocomial pneumonia versus three (16%) of the 18 in supine position (p = 0.001). These results indicate that semirecumbency during the period between extubation and re-intubation may play a role in nosocomial pneumonia development in patients who need re-intubation. Total intensive care unit stay (19.4 +/- 10 versus 13.9 +/- 11.9 days, p = 0.0008) and crude mortality (35 versus 20%, p = 0.14) were also higher in re-intubated patients when compared with controls. We conclude that re-intubation is a risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia and might be avoided in a substantial number of cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599812

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 696

Metadata

Authors
Torres, A., Gatell, J. M., Aznar, E., el-Ebiary, M., Puig de la Bellacasa, J., González, J., Ferrer, M., & Rodriguez-Roisin, R.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1995-07
Volume
152
Issue
1
Pages
137-141
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2062945788
Cited by
696
References
2
FWCI
6.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Re-intubation increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients needing mechanical ventilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599812
The paper
Torres, A., Gatell, J. M., Aznar, E., el-Ebiary, M., Puig de la Bellacasa, J., González, J., Ferrer, M., & Rodriguez-Roisin, R. (1995). Re-intubation increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients needing mechanical ventilation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599812

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.