The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of leukocyte counts in sputum, bronchial biopsies, and bronchoalveolar lavage.
Abstract
To determine the relationship between inflammatory cells in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), and bronchial mucosa, we counted the number of leukocytes in sputum, BAL, and bronchial biopsies obtained from subjects with asthma and with chronic bronchitis in stable condition or during exacerbations. Sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline in the asthma group. Spontaneous sputum was collected in the chronic bronchitis groups. Differential counts of leukocytes were performed on cytospin preparations of sputum and BAL. Eosinophils, macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes were quantified in the submucosa of the bronchial biopsies. In asthma and in stable chronic bronchitis, the percentages of neutrophils were significantly higher in sputum than in BAL, whereas the opposite was true of the percentages of macrophages and lymphocytes. The lymphocyte was the predominant cell infiltrating the bronchial submucosa in all groups. BAL eosinophils correlated with submucosal and sputum eosinophils in the asthma and exacerbated chronic bronchitis groups. A similar trend was observed between submucosal and sputum eosinophils. In conclusion, the relative proportion of inflammatory cells was different in sputum, BAL, and bronchial mucosa. However, there was a fairly good agreement between the number of eosinophils counted with the three techniques in asthmatics and in exacerbated chronic bronchitics, suggesting that sputum cell analysis may be used for a noninvasive assessment of airway eosinophilia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Asthma: From Bronchoconstriction to Airways Inflammation and Remodeling
BOUSQUET, J., JEFFERY, P. K., BUSSE, W. W., JOHNSON, M., & VIGNOLA, A. M. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9903102 · Cited by 1,702
Infections and Airway Inflammation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severe Exacerbations
Papi, A., Bellettato, C. M., Braccioni, F., Romagnoli, M., Casolari, P., Caramori, G., Fabbri, L. M., & Johnston, S. L. (2006) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200506-859oc · Cited by 1,072
Self-citationThe use of induced sputum to investigate airway inflammation
Pavord, I. D., Pizzichini, M. M., Pizzichini, E., & Hargreave, F. E. (1997) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.52.6.498 · Cited by 420
Qiu, Y., Zhu, J., Bandi, V., Atmar, R. L., Hattotuwa, K., Guntupalli, K. K., & Jeffery, P. K. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200208-794oc · Cited by 351
Enhanced neutrophil response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Noguera, A. (2001) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.56.6.432 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Maestrelli, P., Saetta, M., Di Stefano, A., Calcagni, P. G., Turato, G., Ruggieri, M. P., Roggeri, A., Mapp, C. E., & Fabbri, L. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1926-1931
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2138556841
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of leukocyte counts in sputum, bronchial biopsies, and bronchoalveolar lavage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520757
- The paper
- Maestrelli, P., Saetta, M., Di Stefano, A., Calcagni, P. G., Turato, G., Ruggieri, M. P., Roggeri, A., Mapp, C. E., & Fabbri, L. M. (1995). Comparison of leukocyte counts in sputum, bronchial biopsies, and bronchoalveolar lavage. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520757
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.