The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroids.
Abstract
A study was done to compare the efficacy and safety of the coprescription of salmeterol 50 microgram twice daily or 100 microgram twice daily with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 500 micrograms twice daily (SALM 50 and SALM 100) with BDP 1,000 microgram twice daily (BDP 1,000) in patients with asthma not controlled by BDP 500 microgram twice daily (or the equivalent). Following a run-in period, 738 patients at 72 centers were randomized to treatment for 24 wk in a double-blind, parallel-group study during which they maintained a daily record of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) and symptom scores. At about 40 of the centers, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to histamine was measured during and at 3 and 14 d after stopping treatment. Both groups taking salmeterol showed an improvement of more than 45 L/min in their morning PEFR and 30 L/min in their evening PEFR, compared with respective improvements of 16 L/min and 6 L/min in the group taking BDP 1,000. Both the SALM 50 and SALM 100 groups had a significantly increased percentage of symptom-free and rescue-free days and nights compared with the BDP 1,000 group, and there was no difference between the two salmeterol groups. None of the treatments altered BHR. Exacerbation rates did not differ among the three groups. We conclude that in this selected group of symptomatic patients taking BDP 500 micrograms twice daily, the addition of salmeterol provides better improvement in lung function and symptom control, without altering BHR or increasing exacerbation rates, than does doubling the dose of BDP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary
Bateman, E. D., Hurd, S. S., Barnes, P. J., Bousquet, J., Drazen, J. M., FitzGerald, M., Gibson, P., Ohta, K., O'Byrne, P., Pedersen, S. E., et al. (2008) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00138707 · Cited by 3,203
Asthma: From Bronchoconstriction to Airways Inflammation and Remodeling
BOUSQUET, J., JEFFERY, P. K., BUSSE, W. W., JOHNSON, M., & VIGNOLA, A. M. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9903102 · Cited by 1,702
Effect of Inhaled Formoterol and Budesonide on Exacerbations of Asthma
Pauwels, R. A., Löfdahl, C.-G., Postma, D. S., Tattersfield, A. E., O'Byrne, P., Barnes, P. J., & Ullman, A. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199711133372001 · Cited by 1,520
International consensus on (ICON) pediatric asthma
Papadopoulos, N. G., Arakawa, H., Carlsen, K. ‐., Custovic, A., Gern, J., Lemanske, R., Le Souef, P., Mäkelä, M., Roberts, G., Wong, G., et al. (2012) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02865.x · Cited by 455
Shrewsbury, S. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1368 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Woolcock, A., Lundback, B., Ringdal, N., & Jacques, L. A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1481-1488
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W1987062528
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.153.5.8630590
- The paper
- Woolcock, A., Lundback, B., Ringdal, N., & Jacques, L. A. (1996). Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroids. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.153.5.8630590
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.