The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bacteremia and severe sepsis in adults: a multicenter prospective survey in ICUs and wards of 24 hospitals. French Bacteremia-Sepsis Study Group.
Abstract
To examine the relationships between bacteremia and severe sepsis and assess the influence of characteristics of infection on the risk of severe sepsis and outcome of bacteremia, we analyzed all clinically significant episodes of bacteremia occurring during a 2-mo prospective survey of 85,750 admissions to adult wards and intensive care units (ICUs) of 24 hospitals in France. Incidence rates of bacteremia and of bacteremic severe sepsis were 9.8 (95% CI: 9.2 to 10.5) and 2.6 (95% CI: 2.2 to 2.9), respectively, per 1,000 adult admissions; these rates were eight and 32 times higher in ICUs than in wards, respectively. Independent risk factors for severe sepsis during bacteremia included age (p < 0.001) and an intraabdominal (p < 0.001), pulmonary (p < 0.001), neuromeningeal (p = 0.004), or multiple (p < 0.001) source of bacteremia, but not categories of organisms involved. The probability of death at 28 d after bacteremia was 25% (95% CI: 23% to 29%), and was 54% (95% CI: 48% to 61%) in patients with bacteremic severe sepsis. The risk of death after bacteremia increased with age (p < 0.001), a rapidly or ultimately fatal underlying disease (p < 0.001), and the presence of severe sepsis (p < 0.001), shock (p = 0.03), and infection caused by gram-positive organisms other than coagulase-negative staphylococci, relative to other organisms (p < 0.001). A primary urinary tract source of infection was associated with a better prognosis (p = 0.03). We conclude that whereas sources of infection influence both the risk of severe sepsis and the outcome of bacteremia, the microbiologic characteristics of infection influence only the outcome, with gram-negative organisms and coagulase-negative staphylococci posing a lesser risk than other organisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment of Infections
Kollef, M. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., & Fraser, V. J. (1999) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.115.2.462 · Cited by 1,805
Cecconi, M., De Backer, D., Antonelli, M., Beale, R., Bakker, J., Hofer, C., Jaeschke, R., Mebazaa, A., Pinsky, M. R., Teboul, J. L., et al. (2014) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z · Cited by 1,767
Mayr, F. B., Yende, S., & Angus, D. C. (2014) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.27372 · Cited by 1,208
Garnacho-Montero, J., Garcia-Garmendia, J. L., Barrero-Almodovar, A., Jimenez-Jimenez, F. J., Perez-Paredes, C., & Ortiz-Leyba, C. (2003) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000098031.24329.10 · Cited by 718
(2004) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-003-2121-4 · Cited by 638
Metadata
- Authors
- Brun-Buisson, C., Doyon, F., & Carlet, J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 617-624
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2171319646
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacteremia and severe sepsis in adults: a multicenter prospective survey in ICUs and wards of 24 hospitals. French Bacteremia-Sepsis Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810595
- The paper
- Brun-Buisson, C., Doyon, F., & Carlet, J. (1996). Bacteremia and severe sepsis in adults: a multicenter prospective survey in ICUs and wards of 24 hospitals. French Bacteremia-Sepsis Study Group. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810595
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.