Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatment of cat allergy with T-cell reactive peptides.

Norman, P S, Ohman, J L, Long, A A, Creticos, P S, Gefter, M A, Shaked, Z, Wood, R A, Eggleston, P A, Hafner, K B, Rao, P, Lichtenstein, L M, Jones, N H, Nicodemus, C F·1996·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

We induced in allergic humans the counterpart of murine experimental T-cell tolerance. T-cell lines from cat-allergic humans were used to map T-cell epitopes for the principal allergen of cat dander, Fel d 1. Two peptides of 27 amino acids each were synthesized to contain the dominant epitopes (ALLERVAX CAT). After a safety trial, we carried out a blinded study of the dose required for efficacy. We randomly divided 95 cat-sensitive patients into placebo, 7.5 micrograms, 75 micrograms, and 750 micrograms groups. Patients received a subcutaneous injection weekly for 4 wk. Before and after treatment, patients were exposed in a room inhabited by live cats and scored by nose and lung symptoms. Baseline nasal and lung scores (+/-SEM) were 6.2 +/- 0.56 and 5.4 +/- 0.73 in the 750 micrograms group; 7.8 +/- 0.53 and 4.7 +/- 0.68 in the placebo group. Six weeks after treatment, scores adjusted for baseline differences were reduced in the 750 micrograms group: -2.3 +/- 4.9 and -2.3 +/- 0.59 compared with -0.84 +/- 0.50 and -0.85 +/- 0.62 in the placebo group. The 75 micrograms group showed intermediate effects and the 7.5 micrograms group no effect. Linear trend analysis indicated a significant dose response effect: p = 0.05 for nose and 0.03 for lung symptoms. Allergic side effects occurred an hour or more after the first 750 micrograms dose in 16 of 24 patients but required little or no treatment with one exception. T-cell reactive treatment peptides safely improved allergic responses to cats.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.154.6.8970345

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Norman, P. S., Ohman, J. L., Long, A. A., Creticos, P. S., Gefter, M. A., Shaked, Z., Wood, R. A., Eggleston, P. A., Hafner, K. B., Rao, P., Lichtenstein, L. M., Jones, N. H., & Nicodemus, C. F.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1996-12
Volume
154
Issue
6
Pages
1623-1628
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2074525021
Cited by
365
References
0
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of cat allergy with T-cell reactive peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.154.6.8970345
The paper
Norman, P. S., Ohman, J. L., Long, A. A., Creticos, P. S., Gefter, M. A., Shaked, Z., Wood, R. A., Eggleston, P. A., Hafner, K. B., Rao, P., Lichtenstein, L. M., Jones, N. H., & Nicodemus, C. F. (1996). Treatment of cat allergy with T-cell reactive peptides. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.6.8970345

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.