The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Granulocyte activation markers in induced sputum: comparison between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and normal subjects.
Abstract
Airway inflammation is present in asthma and is thought to play a significant part in the development of airflow obstruction. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), neutrophilic inflammation is present in the airway lumen, whereas the submucosa displays a lymphocytic infiltrate. Less is known about the nature and mechanisms of inflammation in COPD than in asthma. Induced sputum allows noninvasive sampling of respiratory tract secretions from patients and control subjects, allowing characterization of cells and measurement of soluble markers. We exploited this technique in order to compare the presence and quantify specific markers of eosinophil and neutrophil activation in subjects with asthma or COPD, and control subjects. Differential cell counts showed significantly higher neutrophil percentages in the patients with COPD compared with other groups, while patients with asthma had higher numbers of eosinophils. The neutrophil markers myeloperoxidase (MPO), from primary granules in neutrophils, and human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL), released from secondary granules, were elevated in patients with asthma and COPD compared with control subjects but markedly more so in COPD. The difference between COPD and asthma was more marked for HNL than for MPO suggesting that HNL may be a better marker for discriminating between these conditions. Concentrations of the eosinophil granule protein, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and the eosinophil granule-derived enzyme, eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) were raised in the patients with asthma and those with COPD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Self-citationMishra, J., Ma, Q., Prada, A., Mitsnefes, M., Zahedi, K., Yang, J., Barasch, J., & Devarajan, P. (2003) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1097/01.asn.0000088027.54400.c6 · Cited by 1,749
Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.2 · Cited by 710
Self-citationKirkham, P. A., & Barnes, P. J. (2013) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.12-2664 · Cited by 685
Self-citationMatrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Lung Remodeling
Atkinson, J. J., & Senior, R. M. (2003) · American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1165/rcmb.2002-0166tr · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Keatings, V. M., & Barnes, P. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 449-453
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2080420512
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Granulocyte activation markers in induced sputum: comparison between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and normal subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032177
- The paper
- Keatings, V. M., & Barnes, P. J. (1997). Granulocyte activation markers in induced sputum: comparison between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and normal subjects. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.