Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 360

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure.

Chatte, G, Sab, J M, Dubois, J M, Sirodot, M, Gaussorgues, P, Robert, D·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize changes in oxygenation, expressed as PaO2/F(I)O2, when patients with severe acute respiratory failure (PaO2/F(I)O2 < 150), unrelated to left ventricular failure to atelectasis, were turned to and from a supine to prone position at 1- and 4-h intervals. Ventilator settings were unchanged. Thirty-two consecutive patients were studied 1 h before, 1 and 4 h during and 1 h after placing in a prone position with PaO2/F(I)O2 of 103 +/- 28, 158 +/- 62, 159 +/- 59, and 128 +/- 52, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.001). After 1 h in a prone position, improvement of PaO2/F(I)O2 by 20 mm Hg or more was considered a positive response. Seven patients studied had no response (22%), hereafter referred to as nonresponders, and 25 had a positive response (78%), hereafter referred to as responders. Among the seven nonresponders, two did not tolerate the prone position and were returned supine before the end of the 4-h trial. With the remaining five, PaO2/F(I)O2 evolution was 83 +/- 29, 77 +/- 19, 83 +/- 33, and 81 +/- 47, respectively. For two of the 25 responders, measurements are missing after returning to the supine position. In 10 of the 23 responders (43%) who completed the 4 h prone trial, the PaO2/F(I)O2 returned to its starting value when patients were repositioned supine: 117 +/- 24, 164 +/- 44, 156 +/- 55, and 110 +/- 34, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.01). In 13 of the 23 (57%) improvement persisted: 105 +/- 27, 187 +/- 58, 189 +/- 49, and 157 +/- 49, respectively (ANOVA, p < 0.001). Repeated improvements after turning to a prone position were frequently observed. Side effects in the 32 patients after a total of 294 periods in a prone position included minor skin injury and edema, two instances of apical atelectasis, one catheter removal, one catheter compression, one extubation, and one transient supraventricular tachycardia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032181

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Chatte, G., Sab, J. M., Dubois, J. M., Sirodot, M., Gaussorgues, P., & Robert, D.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-02
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
473-478
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2137257257
Cited by
360
References
1
FWCI
30.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032181
The paper
Chatte, G., Sab, J. M., Dubois, J. M., Sirodot, M., Gaussorgues, P., & Robert, D. (1997). Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032181

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.