Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 795

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extubation Outcome after Spontaneous Breathing Trials with T-Tube or Pressure Support Ventilation

ESTEBAN, ANDRÉS, ALÍA, INMACULADA, GORDO, FEDERICO, FERNÁNDEZ, RAFAEL, SOLSONA, JOSÉ F., VALLVERDÚ, INMACULADA, MACÍAS, SANTIAGO, ALLEGUE, JOSÉ M., BLANCO, JESÚS, CARRIEDO, DEMETRIO, LEÓN, MIGUEL, de la CAL, MIGUEL A., TABOADA, FRANCISCO, de VELASCO, JUAN GONZALEZ, PALAZÓN, EUGENIO, CARRIZOSA, FRANCISCO, TOMÁS, ROSER, SUAREZ, JOSÉ, GOLDWASSER, ROSANNE S.·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

A 2-h T-tube trial of spontaneous breathing was used in selecting patients ready for extubation and discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. However, some doubt remains as to whether it is the most appropriate method of performing a spontaneous breathing trial. We carried out a prospective, randomized, multicenter study involving patients who had received mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h and who were considered by their physicians to be ready for weaning according to clinical criteria and standard weaning parameters. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo a 2-h trial of spontaneous breathing in one of two ways: with a T-tube system or with pressure support ventilation of 7 cm H2O. If a patient had signs of poor tolerance at any time during the trial, mechanical ventilation was reinstituted. Patients without these features at the end of the trial were extubated. Of the 246 patients assigned to the T-tube group, 192 successfully completed the trial and were extubated; 36 of them required reintubation. Of the 238 patients in the group receiving pressure support ventilation, 205 were extubated and 38 of them required reintubation. The percentage of patients who remained extubated after 48 h was not different between the two groups (63% T-tube, 70% pressure support ventilation, p = 0.14). The percentage of patients falling the trial was significantly higher when the T-tube was used (22 versus 14%, p = 0.03). Clinical evolution during the trial was not different in patients reintubated and successfully extubated. ICU mortality among reintubated patients was significantly higher than in successfully extubated patients (27 versus 2.6%, p < 0.001). Spontaneous breathing trials with pressure support or T-tube are suitable methods for successful discontinuation of ventilator support in patients without problems to resume spontaneous breathing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9610109

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 795

Metadata

Authors
ESTEBAN, A., ALÍA, I., GORDO, F., FERNÁNDEZ, R., SOLSONA, J. F., VALLVERDÚ, I., MACÍAS, S., ALLEGUE, J. M., BLANCO, J., CARRIEDO, D., LEÓN, M., de la CAL, M. A., TABOADA, F., de VELASCO, J. G., PALAZÓN, E., CARRIZOSA, F., TOMÁS, R., SUAREZ, J., & GOLDWASSER, R. S.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
156
Issue
2
Pages
459-465
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2076081817
Cited by
795
References
0
FWCI
16.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extubation Outcome after Spontaneous Breathing Trials with T-Tube or Pressure Support Ventilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9610109
The paper
ESTEBAN, A., ALÍA, I., GORDO, F., FERNÁNDEZ, R., SOLSONA, J. F., VALLVERDÚ, I., MACÍAS, S., ALLEGUE, J. M., BLANCO, J., CARRIEDO, D., LEÓN, M., de la CAL, M. A., TABOADA, F., de VELASCO, J. G., PALAZÓN, E., CARRIZOSA, F., TOMÁS, R., SUAREZ, J., & GOLDWASSER, R. S. (1997). Extubation Outcome after Spontaneous Breathing Trials with T-Tube or Pressure Support Ventilation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9610109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.