The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adherence with Twice-daily Dosing of Inhaled Steroids: Socioeconomic and Health-belief Differences
Abstract
Poor adherence to medication regimens may be contributing to the recent increase in asthma morbidity and mortality. We examined patient characteristics that may influence adherence to twice-daily inhaled steroid regimens. Fifty adults with moderate to severe asthma completed questionnaires examining sociodemographics, asthma severity, and health locus of control. Adherence was electronically monitored for 42 d. Following monitoring, patients' understanding of asthma pathophysiology and the function of inhaled corticosteroids were assessed. Patient beliefs about the effectiveness and convenience of these medications, and their perception of communications with their clinician were measured. Mean adherence was 63% +/- 38%; 54% of subjects recorded at least 70% of the prescribed number of inhaled-steroid actuations. Factors associated with poor adherence were less than 12 yr of formal education (p < 0. 001), poor patient-clinician communication (p < 0.001), household income less than $20,000 (p = 0.002), Spanish as primary language (p = 0.005), and minority status (p = 0.007). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, less than 12 yr of formal education (OR: 6.72; CI: 1.10 to 41.0) and poor patient-clinician communication (OR: 1.2; CI: 1.01 to 1.55) were independently associated with poor adherence. These results emphasize the importance of socioeconomic status and adequate patient-clinician communication for adherence to inhaled-steroid schedules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance
Claxton, A. J., Cramer, J., & Pierce, C. (2001) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80109-0 · Cited by 2,388
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200012283432601 · Cited by 830
Náfrádi, L., Nakamoto, K., & Schulz, P. J. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186458 · Cited by 543
Relationship between adherence to inhaled corticosteroids and poor outcomes among adults with asthma
Williams, L. K., Pladevall, M., Xi, H., Peterson, E. L., Joseph, C., Lafata, J. E., Ownby, D. R., & Johnson, C. C. (2004) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.09.028 · Cited by 489
Patient-centredness in chronic illness: what is it and does it matter?
Michie, S., Miles, J., & Weinman, J. (2003) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00194-5 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- APTER, A. J., REISINE, S. T., AFFLECK, G., BARROWS, E., & ZuWALLACK, R. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1810-1817
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2142653918
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adherence with Twice-daily Dosing of Inhaled Steroids: Socioeconomic and Health-belief Differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9712007
- The paper
- APTER, A. J., REISINE, S. T., AFFLECK, G., BARROWS, E., & ZuWALLACK, R. L. (1998). Adherence with Twice-daily Dosing of Inhaled Steroids: Socioeconomic and Health-belief Differences. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9712007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.