CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 129Nutritional Studies and DietChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Changes in Fresh Fruit Consumption on Ventilatory Function in Healthy British Adults

CAREY, IAIN M., STRACHAN, DAVID P., COOK, DEREK G.·1998·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
DOI 10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9712065
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies have shown frequent fresh fruit consumption to be associated with higher lung function in both children and adults. This relationship is investigated longitudinally in a national sample of 2,171 British adults age 18 to 73 initially examined in 1984, who were reexamined 7 yr later, and had no reported history of chronic respiratory disease throughout. Outcome was assessed by change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between the two examinations, standardized for age, height, and sex and related to fresh fruit consumption estimated by food frequency questionnaires at both examinations. After adjustment for region, social class, and smoking, changes in fresh fruit consumption levels were positively associated with changes in FEV1 (p = 0.002), highlighted by a more marked fall in FEV1 (107 ml; 95% confidence interval, 36 to 178 ml) in subjects who reduced their fresh fruit consumption the greatest compared with those with no change. In contrast, average levels of fruit intake were not associated with change in FEV1 (p = 0.695). The implication is that the cross-sectional effects of fresh fruit consumption on ventilatory function appear to be reversible and not progressive, such that consistently low levels of fresh fruit intake do not appear to increase lung function decline.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9712065

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–129 of 129

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
CAREY, I. M., STRACHAN, D. P., & COOK, D. G.
Affiliations
St George's, University of London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1998-09-01
Volume
158
Issue
3
Pages
728-733
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
DOI
10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9712065
OpenAlex
W2006761082
Cited by
129
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights (vor)
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
fresh fruit consumption, lung function, FEV1 decline, dietary intake, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Body Height, Cross-Sectional Studies, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Forced Expiratory Volume, Fruit, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiration, Sex Factors, Smoking, Social Class, Spirometry, Vital Capacity, Confidence Intervals, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review