Cited by 80Hemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemoglobin structure and function

Accuracy of Pulse Oximetry in Sickle Cell Disease

ORTIZ, FELIPE O., ALDRICH, THOMAS K., NAGEL, RONALD L., BENJAMIN, LENNETTE J.·1999·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Pulmonary complications and hypoxemia are common in sickle cell disease (SCD) and may exacerbate microvascular occlusive phenomena. Thus, detecting hypoxemia is of particular importance in SCD. To assess the accuracy of pulse oximetry in the diagnosis of hypoxemia in SCD, we compared 22 pulse oximetric measurements of arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) in adult patients with SCD and acute vasoocclusive crisis with simultaneously drawn arterial saturation (SaO2 = oxyhemoglobin divided by oxyhemoglobin plus reduced hemoglobin) measured by co-oximetry. We accepted SpO2 readings only if they were stable and characterized by strong and regular photoplethysmographic waves on the oximeter screen. To assess the position of these patients' oxyhemoglobin dissociation curves, we plotted arterial and venous oxygen saturation (SaO2 and SvO2 ) against oxygen tension. We found right-shifted oxyhemoglobin dissociation curves, with pH-corrected p50s ranging from 28 to 38 mm Hg. Pulse oximetry slightly overestimated oxyhemoglobin percentage (by an average of 3.4 percentage points), but it almost always accurately estimated SaO2 (underestimating on average by 1.1 percentage points). The error in SpO2 was never enough to classify a hypoxemic patient erroneously as normoxemic or a normoxemic patient as hypoxemic. We conclude that, as long as strong and regular photoplethysmographic waves are present, pulse oximeters can be relied upon not to misdiagnose either hypoxemia or normoxemia in SCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.159.2.9806108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ORTIZ, F. O., ALDRICH, T. K., NAGEL, R. L., & BENJAMIN, L. J.
Affiliations
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
159
Issue
2
Pages
447-451
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2125500863
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p60hl038655-15)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 38655.)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hemoglobin structure and function
Keywords
pulse oximetry, sickle cell disease, hypoxemia, arterial oxygen saturation, co-oximetry, oxygen dissociation curve, P50, vaso-occlusive crisis, photoplethysmography, measurement accuracy
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Hypoxia, Hemoglobin SC Disease, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Oximetry, Oxygen, Oxyhemoglobins, Reproducibility of Results, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review