Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 885

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Control and Histopathologic Outcome of Asthma when Using Airway Hyperresponsiveness as an Additional Guide to Long-Term Treatment

SONT, JACOB K., WILLEMS, LUUK N. A., BEL, ELISABETH H., van KRIEKEN, J.HAN J. M., VANDENBROUCKE, JAN P., STERK, PETER J., the AMPUL Study Group·1999·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

According to international guidelines, the level and adjustment of antiinflammatory treatment for asthma are based solely on symptoms and lung function. We investigated whether a treatment strategy aimed at reducing airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR strategy) in addition to the recommendations in the existing guidelines (reference strategy) led to: (1) more effective control of asthma; and (2) greater improvement of chronic airways inflammation. To accomplish this, we conducted a randomized, prospective, parallel trial involving 75 adults with mild to moderate asthma who visited a clinic every 3 mo for 2 yr. At each visit, FEV1 and AHR to methacholine were assessed, and subjects kept diaries of symptoms, beta2-agonist use, and peak expiratory flow (PEF). Medication with corticosteroids (four levels) was adjusted according to a stepwise approach (reference strategy), to which four severity classes of AHR were added (AHR strategy). At entry and after 2 yr, bronchial biopsies were obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Patients treated according to the AHR strategy had a 1.8-fold lower rate of mild exacerbations than did patients in the reference strategy group (0. 23 and 0.43 exacerbation/yr/patient, respectively). FEV1 also improved to a significantly greater extent in the AHR strategy group (p </= 0.05). In bronchial biopsies this was accompanied by a greater reduction in thickness of the subepithelial reticular layer in the AHR strategy group than in the reference strategy group (mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7 micrometers (0.2 to 3.1) micrometers]). The changes in AHR in both strategy groups were correlated with eosinophil counts in the biopsies (r = -0.48, p = 0.003). We conclude that reducing AHR in conjunction with optimizing symptoms and lung function leads to more effective control of asthma while alleviating chronic airways inflammation. This implies a role for the monitoring of AHR or other surrogate markers of inflammation in the long-term management of asthma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.159.4.9806052

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 885

Metadata

Authors
SONT, J. K., WILLEMS, L. N. A., BEL, E. H., van KRIEKEN, J. H. J. M., VANDENBROUCKE, J. P., STERK, P. J., & the AMPUL Study Group
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1999-04-01
Volume
159
Issue
4
Pages
1043-1051
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1989260226
Cited by
885
References
1
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Control and Histopathologic Outcome of Asthma when Using Airway Hyperresponsiveness as an Additional Guide to Long-Term Treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.159.4.9806052
The paper
SONT, J. K., WILLEMS, L. N. A., BEL, E. H., van KRIEKEN, J. H. J. M., VANDENBROUCKE, J. P., STERK, P. J., & the AMPUL Study Group. (1999). Clinical Control and Histopathologic Outcome of Asthma when Using Airway Hyperresponsiveness as an Additional Guide to Long-Term Treatment. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.4.9806052

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.