The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of Polyclonal Endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Colonization in Intensive Care Units: Implications for Infection Control
Abstract
We investigated the endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care units (ICUs) through analyses of surveillance cultures (from the rectum, stomach, oropharynx, and trachea; n = 1,089), and clinical cultures (n = 2,393) from 297 consecutive patients. Multiple isolates of P. aeruginosa (n = 353) were genotyped. Variables associated with acquisition of respiratory tract colonization (RTC) were tested in a risk factor analysis. The mean daily prevalence of colonization was 34%. On admission, 22 patients had intestinal colonization and 13 had RTC. Twenty patients acquired colonization in the intestinal and 24 in the respiratory tract. Forty-four different genotypes were found; 38 (86%) were isolated from individual patients only. In all, 37 patients had RTC with a total of 38 genotypes: 13 (34%) were colonized on admission, 9 (24%) acquired RTC with a novel genotype during a stay in the ICU, five (13%) acquired colonization from their intestinal tract and three (8%) were colonized via cross-acquisition. In eight patients (21%), no route could be demonstrated for colonization. Antibiotics providing P. aeruginosa with a selective growth advantage were associated with acquired RTC. Endemicity of colonization with P. aeruginosa is characterized by polyclonality, and seems to be maintained by continuous admittance of colonized patients and selection pressure from antibiotics rather than by cross-acquisition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vollaard, E. J., & Clasener, H. A. (1994) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.38.3.409 · Cited by 478
Cited by
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
Alverdy, J., Holbrook, C., Rocha, F., Seiden, L., Licheng, R., Wu, Musch, M., Chang, E., Ohman, D., & Suh, S. (2000) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200010000-00003 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- BONTEN, M. J. M., BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., SPEIJER, H., & STOBBERINGH, E. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-10-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1212-1219
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W1926501520
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of Polyclonal Endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Colonization in Intensive Care Units: Implications for Infection Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.160.4.9809031
- The paper
- BONTEN, M. J. M., BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., SPEIJER, H., & STOBBERINGH, E. E. (1999). Characteristics of Polyclonal Endemicity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Colonization in Intensive Care Units: Implications for Infection Control. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.4.9809031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.