Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 498

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of α 1 -Antitrypsin Augmentation Therapy

DIRKSEN, ASGER, DIJKMAN, JOOP H., MADSEN, FLEMMING, STOEL, BEREND, HUTCHISON, DUNCAN C. S., ULRIK, CHARLOTTE S., SKOVGAARD, LENE T., KOK-JENSEN, AXEL, RUDOLPHUS, ARJAN, SEERSHOLM, NIELS, VROOMAN, HENRI A., REIBER, JOHAN H. C., HANSEN, NIELS C., HECKSCHER, THOMAS, VISKUM, KAJ, STOLK, JAN·1999·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

We have investigated whether restoration of the balance between neutrophil elastase and its inhibitor, alpha(1)-antitrypsin, can prevent the progression of pulmonary emphysema in patients with alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency. Twenty-six Danish and 30 Dutch ex-smokers with alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency of PI*ZZ phenotype and moderate emphysema (FEV(1) between 30% and 80% of predicted) participated in a double-blind trial of alpha(1)-antitrypsin augmentation therapy. The patients were randomized to either alpha(1)-antitrypsin (250 mg/kg) or albumin (625 mg/kg) infusions at 4-wk intervals for at least 3 yr. Self-administered spirometry performed every morning and evening at home showed no significant difference in decline of FEV(1) between treatment and placebo. Each year, the degree of emphysema was quantified by the 15th percentile point of the lung density histogram derived from computed tomography (CT). The loss of lung tissue measured by CT (mean +/- SEM) was 2.6 +/- 0.41 g/L/yr for placebo as compared with 1.5 +/- 0.41 g/L/yr for alpha(1)-antitrypsin infusion (p = 0.07). Power analysis showed that this protective effect would be significant in a similar trial with 130 patients. This is in contrast to calculations based on annual decline of FEV(1) showing that 550 patients would be needed to show a 50% reduction of annual decline. We conclude that lung density measurements by CT may facilitate future randomized clinical trials of investigational drugs for a disease in which little progress in therapy has been made in the past 30 yr.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9901055

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 498

Metadata

Authors
DIRKSEN, A., DIJKMAN, J. H., MADSEN, F., STOEL, B., HUTCHISON, D. C. S., ULRIK, C. S., SKOVGAARD, L. T., KOK-JENSEN, A., RUDOLPHUS, A., SEERSHOLM, N., VROOMAN, H. A., REIBER, J. H. C., HANSEN, N. C., HECKSCHER, T., VISKUM, K., & STOLK, J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
160
Issue
5
Pages
1468-1472
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1829394506
Cited by
498
References
6
FWCI
9.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Clinical Trial of α 1 -Antitrypsin Augmentation Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9901055
The paper
DIRKSEN, A., DIJKMAN, J. H., MADSEN, F., STOEL, B., HUTCHISON, D. C. S., ULRIK, C. S., SKOVGAARD, L. T., KOK-JENSEN, A., RUDOLPHUS, A., SEERSHOLM, N., VROOMAN, H. A., REIBER, J. H. C., HANSEN, N. C., HECKSCHER, T., VISKUM, K., & STOLK, J. (1999). A Randomized Clinical Trial of α 1 -Antitrypsin Augmentation Therapy. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.160.5.9901055

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.