The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Partial Reversibility of Airflow Limitation and Increased Exhaled NO and Sputum Eosinophilia in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the relationship between the reversibility of airflow limitation, the concentration of nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air, and the inflammatory cells in the sputum of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined nine normal healthy control subjects and 20 nonatopic patients with COPD. Ten patients had no reversibility of airflow limitation (increase in FEV(1) of < 12% and < 200 ml after 200 microg of inhaled salbutamol), and 10 patients had partial reversibility of airflow limitation (increase in FEV(1) of < 12% but > 200 ml after 200 microg of inhaled salbutamol). Exhaled NO levels were higher in COPD patients with partial reversibility of airflow limitation than in those with no reversibility of airflow limitation (median 24 [interquartile range 15.3 to 32] ppb versus 8.9 [4.6 to 14.7] ppb; p < 0.01). Compared with healthy control subjects, only COPD patients with partial reversibility of airflow limitation had increased concentrations of sputum eosinophils. We conclude that, in patients with stable COPD, even a partial bronchodilator response to inhaled salbutamol is associated with increased exhaled NO and sputum eosinophilia, suggesting that these patients may have a different response to treatment than do those without reversible airflow limitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory diseases
Barnes, P. J., & Adcock, I. M. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60326-3 · Cited by 983
Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.2 · Cited by 710
Exhaled nitric oxide measurements: clinical application and interpretation
Taylor, D. R., Pijnenburg, M. W., Smith, A. D., & Jongste, J. C. D. (2006) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2005.056093 · Cited by 507
Guía Española de la EPOC (GesEPOC). Tratamiento farmacológico de la EPOC estable
Miravitlles, M., Soler-Cataluña, J. J., Calle, M., Molina, J., Almagro, P., Quintano, J. A., Riesco, J. A., Trigueros, J. A., Piñera, P., Simón, A., et al. (2012) · Archivos de Bronconeumología · doi:10.1016/j.arbres.2012.04.001 · Cited by 257
Unbalanced oxidant-induced DNA damage and repair in COPD: a link towards lung cancer
Caramori, G., Adcock, I. M., Casolari, P., Ito, K., Jazrawi, E., Tsaprouni, L., Villetti, G., Civelli, M., Carnini, C., Chung, K. F., et al. (2011) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2010.156448 · Cited by 187
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- PAPI, A., ROMAGNOLI, M., BARALDO, S., BRACCIONI, F., GUZZINATI, I., SAETTA, M., CIACCIA, A., & FABBRI, L. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1773-1777
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2056032598
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partial Reversibility of Airflow Limitation and Increased Exhaled NO and Sputum Eosinophilia in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.9910112
- The paper
- PAPI, A., ROMAGNOLI, M., BARALDO, S., BRACCIONI, F., GUZZINATI, I., SAETTA, M., CIACCIA, A., & FABBRI, L. M. (2000). Partial Reversibility of Airflow Limitation and Increased Exhaled NO and Sputum Eosinophilia in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.162.5.9910112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.