The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acute Effects of Particulate Air Pollution on Respiratory Admissions: Results from APHEA 2 Project
Abstract
The APHEA 2 project investigated short-term health effects of particles in eight European cities. In each city associations between particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 microm (PM(10)) and black smoke and daily counts of emergency hospital admissions for asthma (0-14 and 15-64 yr), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and all-respiratory disease (65+ yr) controlling for environmental factors and temporal patterns were investigated. Summary PM(10) effect estimates (percentage change in mean number of daily admissions per 10 microg/m(3) increase) were asthma (0-14 yr) 1.2% (95% CI: 0.2, 2.3), asthma (15-64 yr) 1.1% (0.3, 1.8), and COPD plus asthma and all-respiratory (65+ yr) 1.0% (0.4, 1.5) and 0.9% (0.6, 1.3). The combined estimates for Black Smoke tended to be smaller and less precisely estimated than for PM(10). Variability in the sizes of the PM(10) effect estimates between cities was also investigated. In the 65+ groups PM(10) estimates were positively associated with annual mean concentrations of ozone in the cities. For asthma admissions (0-14 yr) a number of city-specific factors, including smoking prevalence, explained some of their variability. This study confirms that particle concentrations in European cities are positively associated with increased numbers of admissions for respiratory diseases and that some of the variation in PM(10) effect estimates between cities can be explained by city characteristics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kan, H., London, S. J., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Song, G., Zhao, N., Jiang, L., & Chen, B. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.10851 · Cited by 582
Adverse health effects of outdoor air pollutants
Curtis, L., Rea, W., Smith-Willis, P., Fenyves, E., & Pan, Y. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.03.012 · Cited by 579
An official European Respiratory Society statement on physical activity in COPD
Watz, H., Pitta, F., Rochester, C. L., Garcia-Aymerich, J., ZuWallack, R., Troosters, T., Vaes, A. W., Puhan, M. A., Jehn, M., Polkey, M. I., et al. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00046814 · Cited by 526
Air Pollution and Respiratory Viral Infection
Ciencewicki, J., & Jaspers, I. (2007) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370701665434 · Cited by 488
Zanobetti, A., & Schwartz, J. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7550 · Cited by 357
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- ATKINSON, R. W., ROSS ANDERSON, H., SUNYER, J., AYRES, J., BACCINI, M., VONK, J. M., BOUMGHAR, A., FORASTIERE, F., FORSBERG, B., TOULOUMI, G., SCHWARTZ, J., & KATSOUYANNI, K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-15
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1860-1866
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2334837926
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute Effects of Particulate Air Pollution on Respiratory Admissions: Results from APHEA 2 Project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2010138
- The paper
- ATKINSON, R. W., ROSS ANDERSON, H., SUNYER, J., AYRES, J., BACCINI, M., VONK, J. M., BOUMGHAR, A., FORASTIERE, F., FORSBERG, B., TOULOUMI, G., SCHWARTZ, J., & KATSOUYANNI, K. (2001). Acute Effects of Particulate Air Pollution on Respiratory Admissions: Results from APHEA 2 Project. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2010138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.