Cited by 324Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disorders

Modafinil as Adjunct Therapy for Daytime Sleepiness in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

PACK, ALLAN I., BLACK, JED E., SCHWARTZ, JONATHAN R. L., MATHESON, JEAN K.·2001·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome can experience residual daytime sleepiness despite regular use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study assessed the efficacy and safety of modafinil for the treatment of residual daytime sleepiness in such patients. Patients received modafinil (n = 77) (200 mg/d, Week 1; 400 mg/d, Weeks 2 to 4) or matching placebo (n = 80) once daily for 4 wk. Modafinil significantly improved daytime sleepiness, with significantly greater mean changes from baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores at Weeks 1 and 4 (p < 0.001) and in multiple sleep latency times (MSLT) at Week 4 (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients with normalized daytime sleepiness (Epworth score < 10) was significantly higher with modafinil (51%) than with placebo (27%) (p < 0.01), but not for MSLT (> 10 min; 29% versus 25%). Headache (modafinil, 23%; placebo, 11%; p = 0.044) and nervousness (modafinil, 12%; placebo, 3%; p = 0.024) were the most common adverse events. During modafinil or placebo treatment, the mean duration of nCPAP use was 6.2 h/night, with no significant change from baseline observed between groups. Modafinil may be a useful adjunct treatment for the management of residual daytime sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome who are regular users of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2103032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 324

Authors
PACK, A. I., BLACK, J. E., SCHWARTZ, J. R. L., & MATHESON, J. K.
Affiliations
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
164
Issue
9
Pages
1675-1681
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2128103058
Cited by
324
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
ResMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
modafinil, obstructive sleep apnea, daytime sleepiness, residual daytime sleepiness, adjunctive therapy, continuous positive airway pressure, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, multiple sleep latency test, headache, anxiety, adverse events
MeSH terms
Modafinil, Adult, Aged, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Analysis of Variance, Benzhydryl Compounds, Combined Modality Therapy, Consumer Product Safety, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep Stages, Polysomnography, Statistics, Nonparametric, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review