Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 665

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Histopathologic Variability in Usual and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonias

FLAHERTY, KEVIN R., TRAVIS, WILLIAM D., COLBY, THOMAS V., TOEWS, GALEN B., KAZEROONI, ELLA A., GROSS, BARRY H., JAIN, ARVIND, STRAWDERMAN, ROBERT L., FLINT, ANDREW, LYNCH, JOSEPH P., MARTINEZ, FERNANDO J.·2001·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Findings of surgical lung biopsy (SLB) are important in categorizing patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). We investigated whether histologic variability would be evident in SLB specimens from multiple lobes in patients with IIP. SLBs from 168 patients, 109 of whom had multiple lobes biopsied, were reviewed by three pathologists. A diagnosis was assigned to each lobe. A different diagnosis was found between lobes in 26% of the patients. Patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in all lobes were categorized as concordant for UIP (n = 51) and those with UIP in at least one lobe were categorized as discordant for UIP (n = 28). Patients with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) in all lobes were categorized as having fibrotic (n = 25) or cellular NSIP (n = 5). No consistent distribution of lobar histology was noted. Patients concordant for UIP were older (63 +/- 9 [mean +/- SD] yr; p < 0.05 as compared with all other groups) than those discordant for UIP (57 +/- 12 yr) or with fibrotic NSIP (56 +/- 11 yr) or cellular NSIP (50 +/- 9 yr). Semiquantitative high-resolution computed tomography demonstrated a varied profusion of fibrosis (p < 0.05 for all group comparisons), with more fibrosis in concordant UIP (2.13 +/- 0.62) than in discordant UIP (1.42 +/- 0.73), fibrotic NSIP (0.83 +/- 0.58), or cellular NSIP (0.44 +/- 0.42). Survival was better for patients with NSIP than for those in both UIP groups (p < 0.001), although survival in the two UIP groups was comparable (p = 0.16). Lobar histologic variability is frequent in patients with IIP, patients with a histologic pattern of UIP in any lobe should be classified as having UIP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2103074

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 665

Metadata

Authors
FLAHERTY, K. R., TRAVIS, W. D., COLBY, T. V., TOEWS, G. B., KAZEROONI, E. A., GROSS, B. H., JAIN, A., STRAWDERMAN, R. L., FLINT, A., LYNCH, J. P., & MARTINEZ, F. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
164
Issue
9
Pages
1722-1727
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2102838725
Cited by
665
References
0
FWCI
25.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histopathologic Variability in Usual and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2103074
The paper
FLAHERTY, K. R., TRAVIS, W. D., COLBY, T. V., TOEWS, G. B., KAZEROONI, E. A., GROSS, B. H., JAIN, A., STRAWDERMAN, R. L., FLINT, A., LYNCH, J. P., & MARTINEZ, F. J. (2001). Histopathologic Variability in Usual and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonias. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2103074

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.