Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Effect of Supplementary Oral Nutrition in Poorly Nourished Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Efthimiou, J., Fleming, J., Gomes, C., Spiro, S. G.·1988·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Abstract We carried out a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to investigate the effect of a 3-month period of supplementary oral nutrition in 14 poorly nourished outpatients with COPD. Seven patients were randomized into Group 1 who received their normal diet during Months 1 to 3, a supplemented diet during Months 4 to 6, and their original normal diet during Months 7 to 9. The other 7 patients received their normal diet for the entire 9-month study period (Group 2). Seven well-nourished patients (Group 3) matched for age and severity of air-flow obstruction served as control subjects; they received their normal diet for the 9-month study period. Measurements of nutritional status, respiratory muscle and handgrip strength, sternomastoid muscle function (including frequency/force curves, maximal relaxation rate, and a fatigability test), lung function, arterial blood gas tensions, general well-being and breathlessness scores, and 6-min walking distances were carried out monthly in all patients. At the start of the study, the poorly nourished patients had lower mean daily calorie and protein intakes than did the well-nourished patients. The poorly nourished patients had lower respiratory muscle and handgrip strength, and abnormal contractility and increased fatigability of the sternomastoid muscle compared with those in the well-nourished patients. After 3 months of supplementary oral nutrition, there was a significant improvement in the nutritional status of Group 1 patients, as evidenced by an increase in body weight, triceps skinfold thickness, and midarm muscle circumference. Respiratory muscle and handgrip strength increased in parallel with nutritional status, although there were no significant changes in lung function or arterial blood gas tensions. As nutritional status improved, the contractile abnormalities and increased fatigability of the sternomastoid muscle also improved. Features of clinical improvement such as general well-being and breathlessness scores and 6-min walking distances also significantly improved after the 3 months of dietary supplementation. In patients with COPD, malnutrition may result in reduced respiratory and limb muscle strength, increased muscle fatigability and breathlessness, as well as reduced performance, and these changes may be reversed by determined oral nutritional support.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1075

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Efthimiou, J., Fleming, J., Gomes, C., & Spiro, S. G.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1988-05
Volume
137
Issue
5
Pages
1075-1082
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970203735
Cited by
308
References
0
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Supplementary Oral Nutrition in Poorly Nourished Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1075
The paper
Efthimiou, J., Fleming, J., Gomes, C., & Spiro, S. G. (1988). The Effect of Supplementary Oral Nutrition in Poorly Nourished Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1075

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.