Cited by 167Respiratory and Cough-Related ResearchRespiratory viral infections researchPediatric health and respiratory diseases

Cough and the common cold

Curley, Frederick J., Irwin, Richard S., Pratter, Melvin R., Stivers, Diane H., Doern, Gary V., Vernaglia, Paul A., Larkin, Andrew B., Baker, Stephen P.·1988·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

To determine whether the cough of the common cold arises from upper respiratory stimuli and whether antihistamine-decongestant therapy is an effective treatment for this cough, we prospectively evaluated volunteers with uncomplicated common colds in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After completing a standardized questionnaire and undergoing a physical examination, throat-culturing, and pulmonary function testing, subjects took the active drug or identical-appearing placebo for 7 days while they kept a diary in which they ranked the severity of 17 symptoms for 14 days. Pulmonary function testing was repeated, on average, on Days 4, 8, and 14. Forty-six percent of the variation in cough severity could be explained by throat-clearing and 47% of the variation in throat-clearing severity by postnasal drip. FIF50%, the only physiologic parameter that significantly correlated with cough, rose as cough severity fell. Antihistamine-decongestant therapy reduced postnasal drip and significantly decreased the severity of cough, nasal obstruction, nasal discharge, and throat-clearing during the first few days of the common cold. In addition, cough was 20 to 30% less prevalent in the active drug group within 3 days of starting therapy. We conclude that the cough of the common cold arose from upper respiratory tract stimuli and that cough and other cardinal symptoms of the common cold were reduced with antihistamine-decongestant therapy when these symptoms were at thei…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/138.2.305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Curley 1988, the mean severity score for cough was significantly less on days three, four, and five.

    “In Curley 1988, the mean severity score for cough was significantly less on days three, four, and five (exact P value not provided).”
  • In Curley 1988, rhinorrhoea severity scores were significantly lower in the active treatment group on day two and three, but not on days one, four and five.

    “In Curley 1988, severity scores for rhinorrhoea were significantly lower in the active treatment group on day two (exact P value not provided) and three (P < 0.01), but not on days one, four and five.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curley, F. J., Irwin, R. S., Pratter, M. R., Stivers, D. H., Doern, G. V., Vernaglia, P. A., Larkin, A. B., & Baker, S. P.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1988-08-01
Volume
138
Issue
2
Pages
305-311
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039840641
Cited by
167
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Review of Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
Keywords
common cold, cough, postnasal drip, throat clearing, nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, cough severity, lung function
MeSH terms
Adult, Brompheniramine, Clinical Trials as Topic, Common Cold, Cough, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Ephedrine, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Random Allocation, Respiratory Function Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review