Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 823

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nosocomial Pneumonia in Patients Receiving Continuous Mechanical Ventilation: Prospective Analysis of 52 Episodes with Use of a Protected Specimen Brush and Quantitative Culture Techniques

Fagon, Jean-Yves, Chastre, Jean, Domart, Yves, Trouillet, Jean-Louis, Pierre, Josiane, Darne, Christian, Gibert, Claude·1989·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Abstract Epidemiologic studies of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia in patients requiring mechanical ventilation have been limited because of the poor reliability of diagnosis procedures in this setting. To determine prognostic and descriptive factors of ventilator-associated (V-A) pneumonia, we prospectively studied 567 patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for more than 3 days in our unit. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy using a protected specimen brush (PSB) was performed on each patient suspected of having pneumonia because of the presence of a new pulmonary infiltrate and purulent tracheal secretions. The diagnosis of V-A pneumonia was retained only if PSB specimens yielded > 103 cfu/ml of at least one microorganism, unless this result was established to be a false positive result on follow-up. V-A pneumonia developed in 49 patients for a total of 52 episodes (9%). The actuarial risk of V-A pneumonia was 6.5% at 10 days, 19% at 20 days, and 28% at 30 days of ventilation. Patients with pneumonia were significantly older (65 versus 57 yr of age, p < 0.01) and more frequently had severe underlying illnesses (24 versus 10%, p < 0.01) than did patients without pneumonia. A total of 84 microorganisms (51 gram-negative and 33 gram-positive) were isolated in significant concentrations from PSB specimens. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus were involved in 31 and 33% of these pneumonias, respectively. Forty percent of all specimens yielded a polymicrobial flora with more than one potential pathogen. Prior antimicrobial therapy increased the rate of pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa or Acinetobacter spp. (65 versus 19%, p < 0.01) and the frequency of methicillin resistance in staphylococcal infections (100 versus 33%, p < 0.05). Overall mortality in patients with V-A pneumonia was 71% compared with 29% in patients without pneumonia (p < 0.01). Only 13% of patients with pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa or Acinetobacter spp. survived, whereas 31% of patients with pneumonia caused by other bacteria survived (p < 0.01).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/139.4.877

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 823

Metadata

Authors
Fagon, J.-Y., Chastre, J., Domart, Y., Trouillet, J.-L., Pierre, J., Darne, C., & Gibert, C.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1989-04
Volume
139
Issue
4
Pages
877-884
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040388340
Cited by
823
References
0
FWCI
26.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nosocomial Pneumonia in Patients Receiving Continuous Mechanical Ventilation: Prospective Analysis of 52 Episodes with Use of a Protected Specimen Brush and Quantitative Culture Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/139.4.877
The paper
Fagon, J.-Y., Chastre, J., Domart, Y., Trouillet, J.-L., Pierre, J., Darne, C., & Gibert, C. (1989). Nosocomial Pneumonia in Patients Receiving Continuous Mechanical Ventilation: Prospective Analysis of 52 Episodes with Use of a Protected Specimen Brush and Quantitative Culture Techniques. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/139.4.877

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.