Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnostic Value of Quantitative Cultures of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Telescoping Plugged Catheters in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia

Torres, Antoni, De La Bellacasa, Jordi Puig, Xaubet, Antoni, Gonzalez, Juliá, Rodríguez-Roisin, Robert, De Anta, Maria Teresa Jiménez, Vidal, Albert Agustí·1989·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

We compared the diagnostic value of quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and telescoping plugged catheter (TPC) samples in 34 nonimmunocompromised, mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with suspected bacterial pneumonia. A control group of seven "noninfected" MV patients was also studied. In 92% of patients with bacterial pneumonia (32 of 34), simple endotracheal aspiration samples recovered one or more microorganisms. Both BAL and TPC samples cultured colony-forming units (cfu) greater than or equal to 10(3)/ml of one or more microorganisms in 56% (19 of 34) of patients. TPC and BAL culture results agreed on 88.5% (54 of 61) of the recovered microorganisms. Sterile TPC and BAL cultures agreed on 80% (4 of 5) of the cases. Microorganisms cultured from blood samples were also cultured from BAL and TPC specimens. Culture results from the two techniques completely disagreed in only one case (3%). In the control group, one TPC and two BAL cultures yielded microorganisms in cfu greater than or equal to 10(3)/ml. Specificities of BAL and TPC were 71 and 86%, respectively, whereas specificity of endotracheal aspiration was only 14%. Both the bacterial index obtained by TPC and BAL, as well as the quantitative cultures, correlated moderately well (r = 0.78 and 0.72, respectively, p less than 0.001 for both correlations). BAL and TPC results caused changes of antibiotic treatment in 11 of 23 survivors. Neither BAL nor TPC caused complications. Our results demonstrate that BAL and TPC diagnose bacterial pneumonia in MV patients with similar accuracy. Culture results from both techniques showed excellent qualitative and reasonable quantitative agreement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/140.2.306

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Torres, A., De La Bellacasa, J. P., Xaubet, A., Gonzalez, J., Rodríguez-Roisin, R., De Anta, M. T. J., & Vidal, A. A.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1989-08
Volume
140
Issue
2
Pages
306-310
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978767704
Cited by
258
References
0
FWCI
17.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Value of Quantitative Cultures of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Telescoping Plugged Catheters in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/140.2.306
The paper
Torres, A., De La Bellacasa, J. P., Xaubet, A., Gonzalez, J., Rodríguez-Roisin, R., De Anta, M. T. J., & Vidal, A. A. (1989). Diagnostic Value of Quantitative Cultures of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Telescoping Plugged Catheters in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Bacterial Pneumonia. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/140.2.306

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.