Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Inhaled Salmeterol and Salbutamol in Asthmatic Patients: An Evaluation of Asthma Symptoms and the Possible Development of Tachyphylaxis

Ullman, Anders, Hedner, Jan, Svedmyr, Nils·1990·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

Abstract Salmeterol (SM) is a new β2-adrenoceptor agonist for inhaled use that has been shown to produce long-lasting bronchodilation in asthmatic patients. In the present study, evaluating efficacy and possible development of tachyphylaxis after SM, 12 patients with stable asthma were included after the demonstration of reversibility in FEV1 of at least 15% to 200 µg salbutamol (SB) or 20% to 500 µg SB. At inclusion all patients were receiving treatment with inhaled β2-agonists, and 11 of the 12 patients were also receiving inhaled corticosteroids. The patients were treated for two 2-wk periods with either inhaled SM 50 µg twice a day or SB 200 µg four times a day, following a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized design. The treatment periods were separated by a washout period of 1 wk. Dose-response curves to inhaled SB were obtained the day before and the day after each treatment period. On each of these days, basal FEV1, tremor, heart rate, and blood pressure were recorded and were then followed after the inhalation of 100 + 300 + 900 µg SB to obtain a cumulative dose-response curve. During the treatment periods, as well as during the washout week after each treatment, the patients recorded their morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) each day before the inhalation of the study drug. Subjective asthma symptoms were monitored by a visual analog scale after each treatment period. The dose-response curves to SB revealed no signs of a reduced response to SB after any of the treatments, but significant increases in basal FEV1 and FVC were seen after the SM period (p < 0.05). The PEF values were also significantly higher, both in the morning (p < 0.001) and the evening (p < 0.01), during the SM period compared with that during the SB period. The morning PEF during the week after the SM period was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared with the week after the SB treatment. The patients' VAS-score showed a significantly better night's sleep and a lower degree of dyspnea during the SM period (p < 0.05). Of the 12 patients, 10 preferred SM and two had no preference. The use of rescue SB inhalations was about 50% lower during the SM period (p < 0.05). We conclude that inhaled SM 50 µg twice a day produces a better control of asthma symptoms than does SB 200 µg four times a day. There was no evidence of an increased risk for tachyphylaxis in the pulmonary response to β2-stimulation with the more long-acting SM. However, it should be considered that 11 of 12 patients were receiving treatment also with inhaled steroids, which may have prevented the development of tachyphylaxis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/142.3.571

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Ullman, A., Hedner, J., & Svedmyr, N.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1990-09
Volume
142
Issue
3
Pages
571-575
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085246519
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhaled Salmeterol and Salbutamol in Asthmatic Patients: An Evaluation of Asthma Symptoms and the Possible Development of Tachyphylaxis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/142.3.571
The paper
Ullman, A., Hedner, J., & Svedmyr, N. (1990). Inhaled Salmeterol and Salbutamol in Asthmatic Patients: An Evaluation of Asthma Symptoms and the Possible Development of Tachyphylaxis. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/142.3.571

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.