The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Double-blind Trial of Nocturnal Supplemental Oxygen forSleep Desaturation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and a Daytime Pa O 2 above 60 mm Hg
Abstract
The efficacy of nasal oxygen during sleep was evaluated in patients with COPD, episodic rapid eye movement sleep desaturation, and a daytime PaO2 greater than 60 mm Hg. The double-blind, randomized 3-yr trial used nasal oxygen versus room air in two groups of nocturnal sleep desaturating subjects. The setting was the outpatient chest clinic of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. There were 51 patients with moderate to severe COPD, daytime PaO2 greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg: 38 with proven REM sleep desaturation and 13 without desaturation. Nocturnal oxygen at 3 L/min was delivered by concentrator to 19 desaturating subjects, and room air at 3 L/min was delivered by defective concentrator to the remaining 19 desaturating subjects. There was no gas therapy for the 13 nondesaturating subjects. The nocturnal desaturator group who received supplemental oxygen during sleep over 36 months showed a significant downward trend in pulmonary artery pressure (-3.7 mm Hg) compared with desaturating patients treated with room air (+3.9 mm Hg). Nonvascular parameters of hypoxia, such as hemoglobin and red blood cell mass, did not differ between the sham- and oxygen-treated groups. Mortality was decidedly higher in the desaturating patients compared with non-desaturating subjects, but there was no significant difference between oxygen- and sham-treated desaturating subjects. We conclude that nasal supplemental oxygen used during sleep to reverse episodic desaturation in COPD patients whose daytime PaO2 is above 60 mm Hg has a beneficial effect in reducing pulmonary artery pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Celli, B. R., MacNee, W., Agusti, A., Anzueto, A., Berg, B., Buist, A. S., Calverley, P. M. A., Chavannes, N., Dillard, T., Fahy, B., et al. (2004) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.04.00014304 · Cited by 4,421
Attaway, A. H., Bellar, A., Mishra, S., Karthikeyan, M., Sekar, J., Welch, N., Musich, R., Singh, S. S., Kumar, A., Menon, A., et al. (2023) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp283700 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Fletcher, E. C., Luckett, R. A., Goodnight-White, S., Miller, C. C., Qian, W., & Costarangos-Galarza, C.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1070-1076
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040232716
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Double-blind Trial of Nocturnal Supplemental Oxygen forSleep Desaturation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and a Daytime Pa O 2 above 60 mm Hg. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1070
- The paper
- Fletcher, E. C., Luckett, R. A., Goodnight-White, S., Miller, C. C., Qian, W., & Costarangos-Galarza, C. (1992). A Double-blind Trial of Nocturnal Supplemental Oxygen forSleep Desaturation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and a Daytime Pa O 2 above 60 mm Hg. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.