Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Double-blind Trial of Nocturnal Supplemental Oxygen forSleep Desaturation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and a Daytime Pa O 2 above 60 mm Hg

Fletcher, Eugene C., Luckett, Rita A., Goodnight-White, Sheila, Miller, Charles C., Qian, Wei, Costarangos-Galarza, Constantino·1992·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

The efficacy of nasal oxygen during sleep was evaluated in patients with COPD, episodic rapid eye movement sleep desaturation, and a daytime PaO2 greater than 60 mm Hg. The double-blind, randomized 3-yr trial used nasal oxygen versus room air in two groups of nocturnal sleep desaturating subjects. The setting was the outpatient chest clinic of a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. There were 51 patients with moderate to severe COPD, daytime PaO2 greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg: 38 with proven REM sleep desaturation and 13 without desaturation. Nocturnal oxygen at 3 L/min was delivered by concentrator to 19 desaturating subjects, and room air at 3 L/min was delivered by defective concentrator to the remaining 19 desaturating subjects. There was no gas therapy for the 13 nondesaturating subjects. The nocturnal desaturator group who received supplemental oxygen during sleep over 36 months showed a significant downward trend in pulmonary artery pressure (-3.7 mm Hg) compared with desaturating patients treated with room air (+3.9 mm Hg). Nonvascular parameters of hypoxia, such as hemoglobin and red blood cell mass, did not differ between the sham- and oxygen-treated groups. Mortality was decidedly higher in the desaturating patients compared with non-desaturating subjects, but there was no significant difference between oxygen- and sham-treated desaturating subjects. We conclude that nasal supplemental oxygen used during sleep to reverse episodic desaturation in COPD patients whose daytime PaO2 is above 60 mm Hg has a beneficial effect in reducing pulmonary artery pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1070

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Fletcher, E. C., Luckett, R. A., Goodnight-White, S., Miller, C. C., Qian, W., & Costarangos-Galarza, C.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1992-05
Volume
145
Issue
5
Pages
1070-1076
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040232716
Cited by
195
References
0
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Double-blind Trial of Nocturnal Supplemental Oxygen forSleep Desaturation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and a Daytime Pa O 2 above 60 mm Hg. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1070
The paper
Fletcher, E. C., Luckett, R. A., Goodnight-White, S., Miller, C. C., Qian, W., & Costarangos-Galarza, C. (1992). A Double-blind Trial of Nocturnal Supplemental Oxygen forSleep Desaturation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and a Daytime Pa O 2 above 60 mm Hg. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/145.5.1070

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.