The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nosocomial Bronchopneumonia in the Critically III: Histologic and Bacteriologic Aspects
Abstract
To provide a comprehensive description of the histologic and bacteriologic characteristics of human nosocomial bronchopneumonia (BPN), the lungs of 83 critically ill patients decreased after a period of mechanical ventilation were examined in the immediate postmortem period. In addition, the accuracy of the protected minibronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) technique in the diagnosis of nosocomial BPN was evaluated. In each patient, a surgical pneumonectomy was performed at the bedside within 30 min following death. Each pulmonary lobe was sampled and bacteriologically analyzed using semiquantitative cultures in 50 patients and quantitative cultures in 33 patients. The entire lung was histologically analyzed using 5 to 10 slices per lung segment. In 69 patients, the bacteriologic result of a protected mini-BAL performed within 48 h preceding death was compared with histologic and bacteriologic results of study of the lung tissue itself. Histologic lesions of BPN were found in 43 of the 83 lungs examined. These lesions were (1) severe in the majority of patients (confluent BPN, n = 23; lung abscess, n = 6), (2) preferentially found in dependent lung segments, (3) often associated with nonspecific alveolar damage, (4) associated with positive lung cultures in 65% of patients (53% with gram-negative bacteria), (5) polymicrobial in 28% of patients, (6) characterized by a lobar bacterial burden greater than 10(3) cfu/g in 32% of cases. Using semiquantitative bacteriologic analysis, the sensitivity and the specificity of the protected mini-BAL in the diagnosis of nosocomial BPN were found to be 70 and 69%, respectively. Protected mini-BAL identified 77% of causative microorganisms of BPN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Influence of Mini-BAL Cultures on Patient Outcomes
MD, M. H. K., & Ward, S. (1998) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.113.2.412 · Cited by 494
Marquette, C. H., Copin, M. C., Wallet, F., Neviere, R., Saulnier, F., Mathieu, D., Durocher, A., Ramon, P., & Tonnel, A. B. (1995) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.151.6.7767535 · Cited by 334
Does This Patient Have Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia?
Klompas, M. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.14.1583 · Cited by 304
EL-EBIARY, M., TORRES, A., FÁBREGAS, N., de la BELLACASA, J. P., GONZÁLEZ, J., RAMIREZ, J., del BAÑO, D., HERNÁNDEZ, C., & JIMÉNEZ de ANTA, M. T. (1997) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9612023 · Cited by 271
Nosocomial pneumonia in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
CHASTRE, J., TROUILLET, J. L., VUAGNAT, A., JOLY-GUILLOU, M. L., CLAVIER, H., DOMBRET, M. C., & GIBERT, C. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.4.9708057 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Rouby, J.-J., De Lassale, E. M., Poete, P., Nicolas, M.-H., Bodin, L., Jarlier, V., Charpentier, Y. L., Grosset, J., & Viars, P.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-10
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1059-1066
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970160477
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nosocomial Bronchopneumonia in the Critically III: Histologic and Bacteriologic Aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.1059
- The paper
- Rouby, J.-J., De Lassale, E. M., Poete, P., Nicolas, M.-H., Bodin, L., Jarlier, V., Charpentier, Y. L., Grosset, J., & Viars, P. (1992). Nosocomial Bronchopneumonia in the Critically III: Histologic and Bacteriologic Aspects. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.1059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.