Cited by 887Asthma and respiratory diseasesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Measuring Quality of Life in Asthma

Juniper, Elizabeth F., Guyatt, Gordon H., Ferrie, Penelope J., Griffith, Lauren E.·1993·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the measurement properties of an Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. The study design was an 8-wk unblinded single cohort with assessments at 0, 4, and 8 wk. Thirtynine adults with symptomatic asthma and a wide range of airway responsiveness and medication requirements were enrolled from previous studies and through notices in the local media. Those with inadequately controlled asthma were offered an inhaled steroid (budesonide). Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, spirometry, a clinical asthma control questionnaire, medication requirements, airway responsiveness to methacholine, the Sickness Impact Profile, and the Rand questionnaire were recorded at each visit. Patients kept daily diaries of peak flow rates and medications. The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire was able to detect changes in patients who responded to treatment or who had natural fluctuations in their asthma (p < 0.001) and to differentiate these patients from those who remained stable (p < 0.001). The Questionnaire was reproducible in patients who were stable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.92). There were significant longitudinal and cross-sectional correlations between asthma quality of life and other measures of both clinical asthma and generic quality of life. We conclude that the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire has good measurement properties and that it is valid as both an evaluative and a discriminative instrument. It measures the component of asthma most important to patients, and it should be considered for inclusion in all asthma studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm/147.4.832

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 887

Authors
Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H., Ferrie, P. J., & Griffith, L. E.
Affiliations
McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Juniper, Elizabeth F.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1993-04-01
Volume
147
Issue
4
Pages
832-838
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003292549
Cited by
887
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Review of Respiratory Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
asthma, quality of life, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, measurement properties, questionnaire validity, reproducibility, asthma control, budesonide, inhaled corticosteroids, airway responsiveness, methacholine challenge, peak expiratory flow, Sickness Impact Profile, generic quality of life
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Asthma, Attitude to Health, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review