The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Safety of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Patients with Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Abstract
Although shown to be safe in many other lung disorders, the safety of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in critically ill patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains unproven. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the safety of BAL in patients with ARDS. There were 438 patients with ARDS at our institution during the study period. Of these, 110 underwent FOB and BAL for either research or clinical purposes. Data were collected at baseline, at 5-min intervals during the procedure, and 1 h after the procedure. We did not detect any statistically or clinically significant changes in PaO2/FlO2, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, peak inspiratory pressure, or static thoracic compliance after the procedure. A small decrease in SaO2 occurred after BAL. Although this change was statistically significant, the magnitude was not of clinical importance. Five patients (4.5%) had transient arterial oxygen desaturation to < 90% during FOB and one patient (0.9%) experienced desaturation to < 80%. There were no prolonged episodes of severe hypoxemia. No serious bleeding occurred. One pneumothorax developed during the procedure. No deaths occurred that were related to the procedure. We conclude that FOB and BAL can be performed safely and are reasonably well-tolerated in patients with ARDS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gadek, J. E., DeMichele, S. J., Karlstad, M. D., Pacht, E. R., Donahoe, M., Albertson, T. E., Van Hoozen, C., Wennberg, A. K., Nelson, J. L., & Noursalehi, M. (1999) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199908000-00001 · Cited by 757
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
Contributions of High Mobility Group Box Protein in Experimental and Clinical Acute Lung Injury
Ueno, H., Matsuda, T., Hashimoto, S., Amaya, F., Kitamura, Y., Tanaka, M., Kobayashi, A., Maruyama, I., Yamada, S., Hasegawa, N., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200402-188oc · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinberg, K. P., Mitchell, D. R., Maunder, R. J., Milberg, J. A., Whitcomb, M. E., & Hudson, L. D.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 556-561
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057559930
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Patients with Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.556
- The paper
- Steinberg, K. P., Mitchell, D. R., Maunder, R. J., Milberg, J. A., Whitcomb, M. E., & Hudson, L. D. (1993). Safety of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Patients with Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.