The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Should fiberoptic bronchoscopy aspirates be cultured?
Abstract
The reliability of fiberoptic bronchoscopy as a method to study the bacteriology of the lower respiratory tract was tested. The procedure used was suction aspiration through the inner channel after topical anesthesia with lidocaine. To detect contamination by oropharyngeal bacteria, the aspirates were cultured in patients with no evidence of active infection, comparison was made with results of transtracheal aspiration cultures, and the aspirate was tested for the presence of an oral dye marker. Results with all 3 methods of analysis indicated contamination with oropharyngeal bacteria that were presumably introduced during instrumentation through the upper airways. An additional factor studied was the effect of topical anesthetics. Analysis of aspirates showed that as much as 96 per cent of the specimen was anesthetic solution. Lidocaine also proved toxic to lower respiratory tract pathogens, although there were significant differences between bacterial species. It was concluded that fiberoptic bronchoscopy as performed in this study does not reliably reflect the bacteriology of the lower respiratory tract.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changing Pharyngeal Bacterial Flora of Hospitalized Patients: Emergence of Gram-Negative Bacilli
Johanson, W. G., Pierce, A. K., & Sanford, J. P. (1969) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm196911202812101 · Cited by 910
Cited by
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_225126 · Cited by 406
Charlson, E. S., Diamond, J. M., Bittinger, K., Fitzgerald, A. S., Yadav, A., Haas, A. R., Bushman, F. D., & Collman, R. G. (2012) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0693oc · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, J. G., Alexander, J., Mayhew, J. F., Sullivan-Sigler, N., & Gorbach, S. L.
- Venue
- PubMed
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Published
- 1976-07-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-8
- OpenAlex
- W1791083430
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Should fiberoptic bronchoscopy aspirates be cultured? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/arrd.1976.114.1.73
- The paper
- Bartlett, J. G., Alexander, J., Mayhew, J. F., Sullivan-Sigler, N., & Gorbach, S. L. (1976). Should fiberoptic bronchoscopy aspirates be cultured? PubMed. https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1976.114.1.73
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.