The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1– 3
Abstract
We recruited 985 patients with COPD but without hypoxemia or other serious disease, treated them in a standard fashion, and followed them closely for nearly 3 yr. At the time of recruitment the patients were carefully characterized as to symptom severity, lung function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life, and studies of lung function were repeated during follow-up. Overall mortality was 23% in 3 yr of follow-up. Patient age and the initial value of the FEV1 were the most accurate predictors of death; when FEV1 before bronchodilator was used, the response to bronchodilators was directly related to survival, but this relationship became nonsignificant when postbronchodilator FEV1 was used as a primary predictor. After adjustment for age and FEV1, mortality was related positively to TLC, resting heart rate, and perceived physical disability, and related negatively to exercise tolerance. These relationships, though significant, were relatively weak. When standardized for age and FEV1, mortality in the present series was less than that of a previous series (4), and the same as that of hypoxemic patients with COPD who received continuous home O2 therapy. Changes in FEV1 with time averaged -44 ml/yr, but the standard deviation was large. Patients with low initial values of FEV1 showed relatively little further decline, probably indicating a survivor effect. In patients with well-preserved initial FEV1, rate of decline correlated negatively with bronchodilator response, symptomatic wheezing, and psychological disturbances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interpretative strategies for lung function tests
Pellegrino, R., Viegi, G., Brusasco, V., Crapo, R. O., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., van der Grinten, C. P. M., Gustafsson, P., Hankinson, J., et al. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00035205 · Cited by 5,945
Celli, B. R., MacNee, W., Agusti, A., Anzueto, A., Berg, B., Buist, A. S., Calverley, P. M. A., Chavannes, N., Dillard, T., Fahy, B., et al. (2004) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.04.00014304 · Cited by 4,421
Celli, B. R., Cote, C. G., Marin, J. M., Casanova, C., Montes de Oca, M., Mendez, R. A., Pinto Plata, V., & Cabral, H. J. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021322 · Cited by 4,015
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
McCarthy, B., Casey, D., Devane, D., Murphy, K., Murphy, E., & Lacasse, Y. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003793.pub3 · Cited by 2,643
Weight Loss Is a Reversible Factor in the Prognosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
SCHOLS, A. M. W. J., SLANGEN, J., VOLOVICS, L., & WOUTERS, E. F. M. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9705017 · Cited by 1,085
Metadata
- Authors
- Anthonisen, N. R., Wright, E. C., Hodgkin, J. E., & IPPB Trial Group
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1853608828
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1– 3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/arrd.1986.133.1.14
- The paper
- Anthonisen, N. R., Wright, E. C., Hodgkin, J. E., & IPPB Trial Group. (1986). Prognosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 1– 3. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1986.133.1.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.