Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Clinical, Radiographic, and Physiologic Scoring System for the Longitudinal Assessment of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 1– 3

Watters, Leslie C., King, Talmadge E., Schwarz, Marvin I., Waldron, James A., Stanford, Ray E., Cherniack, Reuben M.·1986·American Review of Respiratory Disease

Abstract

In order to develop a reproducible, quantifiable means of assessment of the clinical status of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a composite clinical-radiographic-physiologic (CRP) scoring system was devised, using 7 variables: dyspnea, chest radiograph, spirometry, lung volume, diffusion capacity, resting alveolar-arterial PO2, and exercise O2 saturation. To assess this scoring system, we examined the relationships between CRP scores and histopathologic findings, including a cellular pathology score composed of abnormalities deemed to be potentially reversible, a fibrotic pathology score based on abnormalities felt to be essentially irreversible, and an index of overall pathologic derangement (total pathology score), derived from the sum of the cellular and fibrotic scores. The initial CRP determination at the time of open lung biopsy correlated significantly with the total pathology score (r = 0.61, p less than 0.001). The CRP score determined after 6 months of corticosteroid therapy showed a significant correlation with the fibrotic pathology score present on open lung biopsy (r = 0.76, p less than 0.001). The change in CRP after 6 months of corticosteroid therapy tended to reflect the cellular histopathologic component of the open lung biopsy (r = -0.43, p less than 0.10). Moreover, in none of these relationships did any individual component of the CRP score correlate better with the respective histopathologic index than did the CRP score itself. These data suggest that this CRP score is useful for the estimation of the severity of underlying pathologic derangement and for the longitudinal quantitative assessment of clinical impairment in patients with IPF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/arrd.1986.133.1.97

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Watters, L. C., King, T. E., Schwarz, M. I., Waldron, J. A., Stanford, R. E., & Cherniack, R. M.
Venue
American Review of Respiratory Disease
Published
1986-01
Volume
133
Issue
1
Pages
97-103
ISSN
0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1806301233
Cited by
266
References
0
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Clinical, Radiographic, and Physiologic Scoring System for the Longitudinal Assessment of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 1– 3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/arrd.1986.133.1.97
The paper
Watters, L. C., King, T. E., Schwarz, M. I., Waldron, J. A., Stanford, R. E., & Cherniack, R. M. (1986). A Clinical, Radiographic, and Physiologic Scoring System for the Longitudinal Assessment of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 1– 3. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1986.133.1.97

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.