Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Lacasse, Yves, Selman, Moises, Costabel, Ulrich, Dalphin, Jean-Charles, Ando, Masayuki, Morell, Ferran, Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen, Riitta, Müller, Nestor, Colby, Thomas V., Schuyler, Mark, Cormier, Yvon·2003·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

The diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is difficult and often relies on histopathology. Our objective was to identify diagnostic criteria and to develop a clinical prediction rule for this disease. Consecutive patients presenting a condition for which HP was considered in the differential diagnosis underwent a program of simple standardized diagnostic procedures. High-resolution computed tomography scan and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) defined the presence or absence of HP. Patients underwent surgical lung biopsy when the computed tomography scan, BAL, and other diagnostic procedures failed to yield a diagnosis. A cohort of 400 patients (116 with HP, 284 control subjects) provided data for the rule derivation. Six significant predictors of HP were identified: (1) exposure to a known offending antigen, (2) positive precipitating antibodies to the offending antigen, (3) recurrent episodes of symptoms, (4) inspiratory crackles on physical examination, (5) symptoms occurring 4 to 8 hours after exposure, (6) and weight loss. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.90-0.95). The rule retained its accuracy when validated in a separate cohort of 261 patients. The diagnosis of HP can often be made or rejected with confidence, especially in areas of high or low prevalence, respectively, without BAL or biopsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200301-137oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Lacasse, Y., Selman, M., Costabel, U., Dalphin, J.-C., Ando, M., Morell, F., Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen, R., Müller, N., Colby, T. V., Schuyler, M., & Cormier, Y.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-10-15
Volume
168
Issue
8
Pages
952-958
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2136291177
Cited by
634
References
1
FWCI
16.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200301-137oc
The paper
Lacasse, Y., Selman, M., Costabel, U., Dalphin, J.-C., Ando, M., Morell, F., Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen, R., Müller, N., Colby, T. V., Schuyler, M., & Cormier, Y. (2003). Clinical Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200301-137oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.